The only Political Thread on Www.Hotboat.Com

[314joey]

The sad thing is she clearly broke the law and Obummer and his DOJ will never do anything about it, our country is going down the chitter.

[2manymustangs]

The sad thing is she clearly broke the law and Obummer and his DOJ will never do anything about it, our country is going down the chitter.

Addition ^^^ Open up a Canadian branch of said "charity" and try to BUFFALO people into believing that Canadian law prohibits disclosure of donor IDs (which it doesn't as per the legal analysts...................

Place a scapegoat in charge of said Canadian branch of said "charity" and VIRTUALLY hold him hostage when he is hauled in for questioning...............

[2manymustangs]

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/13-of-abe...-100-redacted/

SO, was there only 3 or 4 emails in the GREY area of "classified" with a tiny little obscure "C" on them???

"Fox News commented that the fact that portions of the FBI investigative file are heavily redacted and must be held and read by lawmakers in a secure facility on Capitol Hill shows how classified the material remains, despite claims made by the Clinton campaign.

“The campaign’s call to release the FBI agents’ notes appears suspect because the material is too highly classified to make public,” Fox News reported. “The FBI told the committee that the documents cannot be released in part or in full without prior agency approval.”

Appearing on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” show Aug. 22, Chaffetz again complained about the high level of redactions in the released FBI documents.

“Hillary Clinton is out there saying there’s not very much sensitive information in there, that she didn’t trade in sensitive classified information. It’s so sensitive and so classified that even I as the chairman of the Oversight Committee don’t have the high level of clearance to see what’s in those materials,” Chaffetz said."

[cdnoutlaw]

Addition ^^^ Open up a Canadian branch of said "charity" and try to BUFFALO people into believing that Canadian law prohibits disclosure of donor IDs (which it doesn't as per the legal analysts...................

Place a scapegoat in charge of said Canadian branch of said "charity" and VIRTUALLY hold him hostage when he is hauled in for questioning...............

Please keep us as Canadians out of your politics , we (as the best neighbours you guys could have) will except whoever you guys vote for. Imagine having a hostile or unfriendly country on your border


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[314joey]

Please keep us as Canadians out of your politics , we (as the best neighbours you guys could have) will except whoever you guys vote for. Imagine having a hostile or unfriendly country on your border


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm cool with that, but could you take that no-talent Bieber back, he's yours and he's such a turd, we don't want him anymore......................lmao

[The Doctor]

So this is the picture of being oppressed by white people. You are adopted by loving white parents and raised with love.
Sure sheds lots of light on him.

[314joey]

So this is the picture of being oppressed by white people. You are adopted by loving white parents and raised with love.
Sure sheds lots of light on him.]

This guy is a disgrace, they should make his azz sit on the bench during the game, if I was a ticket holder I would give them up until he acted right, what a jerk-off.

[2manymustangs]

This guy is a disgrace, they should make his azz sit on the bench during the game, if I was a ticket holder I would give them up until he acted right, what a jerk-off.

You will be waiting a long time.................

[cdnoutlaw]

I'm cool with that, but could you take that no-talent Bieber back, he's yours and he's such a turd, we don't want him anymore......................lmao

You guys paid for him, your statute of limitation has run out your stuck with him!
Lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[The Doctor]

Read in the Los Angeles Times
Their attempt to bash a candidate. You might be surprised to see who . . .

"He's nothing but a B-List TV personality. He has no business being in politics."
"He's been divorced and remarried. He can't commit to anything."
"He's dangerously ignorant about international affairs. The Russian leaders will walk all over him."
"He has no filter - doesn't think before he speaks."
"Until recently, he was a Democrat. He's not a real Republican. He hasn't paid his GOP dues."
"He used to be Pro Choice. Now, suddenly he's Pro Life?"
"That can't be his real hair!"
"He's a loose cannon. No one wants HIS finger on the nuclear button."
"His opponent has the experience and political savvy to be president. He does not."
"He's just not presidential."
"His temperament disqualifies him from ever being Commander-In-Chief."
"He's proven himself to be mentally unstable."
"The military will never accept him as Commander-In-Chief. He's not smart enough."
"The GOP doesn't want him to be the head of the party. He could never reach across the aisle to get anything done."
"Most Republican voters will just stay home rather than go out and vote for him."
"Evangelicals will never support him."
"He says (Let’s) Make America Great Again. How dare he say we aren't still great?!?!"
"His intellect is thinner than spit on a slate rock.”
"90 percent of Republican state chairmen judge him guilty of simplistic approaches, with no depth in federal government administration and no experience in foreign affairs."
"His spontaneity with reporters and voters plays well but also gives him plenty of space to disgorge fantasies and factual errors so prolific and often outrageous that he single-handedly makes the word gaffe a permanent fixture in America’s political vernacular. He confuses Pakistan with Afghanistan. He claimed once that trees contributed 93 percent of the atmosphere’s nitrous oxide..."
"After all his gaffs, he doubles down on them instead of admitting he made a mistake."
"He's threatening to upend our treaties and relationships with our allies by demanding that they pay for their own defense!"
"Because of his gross factual errors he might take rash action and needlessly lead this country into open warfare!"
"He's racist, xenophobic, and fuels the fires of hatred!"
"You shouldn't take him seriously. He has a penchant for offering simplistic solutions to hideously complex problems and a stubborn insistence that he is always right in every argument.”
"The rising turnout of his voters are not loyal Republicans or Democrats and are alienated from both parties because neither takes a sympathetic view toward their issues.”
"He wears the disdain he draws from the GOP elites as a badge of honor. Henry Kissinger’s championing the other GOP candidate and attacking him are actually helping him!"
"The fact that he could be deemed a serious candidate for president is a shame and embarrassment for the country.” The New Yorker observed that his appeal “has to do not with competence at governing but with the emotion he evokes... [He] lets people get out their anger and frustration, their feeling of being misunderstood and mishandled by those who have run our government, their impatience with taxes and with the poor and the weak, their impulse to deal with the world’s troublemakers by employing the stratagem of a punch in the nose.”
"His unpopular opponent presided over the current Iranian crisis... and a reeling economy, yet surely the Democrat will prevail over him."
"Is he Safe? …he shoots from the hip … he's over his head … What are his solutions?”
"Voters want to follow some authority figure, — a leader who can take charge with authority; return a sense of discipline to our government; and, manifest the willpower needed to get this country back on track -- Or at least a leader from outside Washington,"

Sound familiar? You’ve heard this all about Donald Trump, right?

Try Again.
All this was said of Ronald Reagan in 1976 and 1980. Most of it was BY OTHER REPUBLICANS, and Reagan turned out to be arguably one of the greatest presidents of the 20th Century, if not of all time (excluding George Washington.)