Who needs a DL.
Printable View
Who needs a DL.
Get out the popcorn and grab a seat folks...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/breaking-benghazi-docs-found-deleted-hillary-clinton-email-files-state-dept/
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/court-orders-new-clinton-email-production-september-13/
In a court filing this week, the State Department admitted it had found Benghazi-related documents among the 14,900 Clinton emails and attachments uncovered by the FBI that Mrs. Clinton deleted and withheld from the State Department.
The first batch of new emails comes in response to a court order issued today in a November 13, 2015, Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed against the Department of State seeking all communications between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House from the day of the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi and throughout the following week. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Dr. Larry Kawa of Boca Raton, Florida, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division (Larry Kawa v. U.S. Department of State (No. 9:15-cv-81560)). Today’s order requiring the production of the emails from the 14,900 new Clinton emails as well as any other communications or emails from the other materials recently delivered to the State Department by the FBI was issued by U.S. District Court Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. The court ruled:
The State Department shall search the material, determine whether any responsive records exist, and complete its first production of non-exempt records, to the extent any exist, by September 13, 2016.
In a separate case, Judicial Watch has been seeking Clinton’s communications about the attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, during which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith were killed. A second assault targeted a nearby compound, killing two government contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00692)).
After admitting in an August 23 court filing that it found documents that “satisfied the [Benghazi related] search terms” of the new Clinton emails, the State Department proposed a rolling production schedule, “under which State would make its first production of any non-exempt responsive records subject to FOIA on September 30, 2016, and complete production no later than October 31, 2016.” Judicial Watch then asked the court that State make known the volume of documents remaining to be reviewed before it accepts whether the production schedule is reasonable. Today, U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta informed the attorneys the Court wants to schedule a hearing on this issue for Tuesday, August 30.
The sad thing is she clearly broke the law and Obummer and his DOJ will never do anything about it, our country is going down the chitter.
Addition ^^^ Open up a Canadian branch of said "charity" and try to BUFFALO people into believing that Canadian law prohibits disclosure of donor IDs (which it doesn't as per the legal analysts...................Quote:
Originally Posted by 314joey
Place a scapegoat in charge of said Canadian branch of said "charity" and VIRTUALLY hold him hostage when he is hauled in for questioning...............
http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/13-of-abe...-100-redacted/
SO, was there only 3 or 4 emails in the GREY area of "classified" with a tiny little obscure "C" on them???
"Fox News commented that the fact that portions of the FBI investigative file are heavily redacted and must be held and read by lawmakers in a secure facility on Capitol Hill shows how classified the material remains, despite claims made by the Clinton campaign.
“The campaign’s call to release the FBI agents’ notes appears suspect because the material is too highly classified to make public,” Fox News reported. “The FBI told the committee that the documents cannot be released in part or in full without prior agency approval.”
Appearing on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” show Aug. 22, Chaffetz again complained about the high level of redactions in the released FBI documents.
“Hillary Clinton is out there saying there’s not very much sensitive information in there, that she didn’t trade in sensitive classified information. It’s so sensitive and so classified that even I as the chairman of the Oversight Committee don’t have the high level of clearance to see what’s in those materials,” Chaffetz said."
Please keep us as Canadians out of your politics , we (as the best neighbours you guys could have) will except whoever you guys vote for. Imagine having a hostile or unfriendly country on your borderQuote:
Originally Posted by 2manymustangs
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm cool with that, but could you take that no-talent Bieber back, he's yours and he's such a turd, we don't want him anymore......................lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by cdnoutlaw
So this is the picture of being oppressed by white people. You are adopted by loving white parents and raised with love.
Sure sheds lots of light on him.
Attachment 64134
:) do you mean like MEXICO???Quote:
Originally Posted by cdnoutlaw
I don't have to imagine having a hostile/unfriendly country on our border...
Look what the Mexico (federal and local) govt has given us in exchange for all of the wealth/jobs we have given that nation...
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Doctor
This guy is a disgrace, they should make his azz sit on the bench during the game, if I was a ticket holder I would give them up until he acted right, what a jerk-off.
You will be waiting a long time.................Quote:
Originally Posted by 314joey
Looks like the 49ers may make him sit, I hope so, he's chitty QB anyway.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/...Ydy?li=BBnb7Kz
Quote:
Originally Posted by 314joey
The FRISCO 49ers??? :stir: Just remembering how much GRADS liked it when we would say FRISCO instead of SanFran or ....................... :D
That loser probably sits during the anthem too.
:rant:Quote:
Originally Posted by 314joey
http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/29/exclusive-hillarys-closest-aides-call-her-email-policy-outrageous-unbelievable/
Three months into her term as secretary of state, two of Hillary Clinton’s top aides bluntly called her indiscriminate release of her private email address “outrageous” and “unbelievable,” according to an April 2009 email chain obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The email indicates that very early into her term as the country’s top diplomat, Clinton’s two closest aides were scandalized by their boss’ indifference towards email security. “This is so unbelievable, she should not be giving her email to everyone,” said a frustrated Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills in an April 3, 2009, email exchange with Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin. “Don’t get me started,” stated Abedin. “Personally, I think it’s outrageous.”
Three months into her term as secretary of state, two of Hillary Clinton’s top aides bluntly called her indiscriminate release of her private email address “outrageous” and “unbelievable,” according to an April 2009 email chain obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The email indicates that very early into her term as the country’s top diplomat, Clinton’s two closest aides were scandalized by their boss’ indifference towards email security. “This is so unbelievable, she should not be giving her email to everyone,” said a frustrated Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills in an April 3, 2009, email exchange with Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin. “Don’t get me started,” stated Abedin. “Personally, I think it’s outrageous.”
They dog poor Lochte and she gets a free pass.
read my siggyQuote:
Originally Posted by 314joey
Just saying!Quote:
Originally Posted by 2manymustangs
And with that info of yours , thanks for agreeing with me/us.
We up here in Canada hope when it comes for you guys to vote , your selection will win over the other and be another great president for you guys[emoji846]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I read it every time I see one of your posts.........lolQuote:
Originally Posted by 2manymustangs
We may just see this in 2020 or 2024.