Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 50 of 50
  1. #41

    That's An Easy One

    The I.R.S.!!! They have managed to screw each and everyone of us and have been doing so generation after generation right out of the gate...

  2. #42
    Senior Member SBS933's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Socialist Republic of California
    Posts
    1,278
    Quote Originally Posted by Sharp shooter View Post
    You belong in this boat man! lol

    That would be one sweet deal, I'd drink an 18 pack of original to run that deal up the river.
    Believe 1/2 of what you see and nothing of what you hear.

  3. #43
    I'm going to nominate the Colt SAA, .45 caliber


    CH3NO2
    CH3NO2

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Stainless View Post
    I'm going to nominate the Colt SAA, .45 caliber


    CH3NO2
    Same for the Colt .45 auto pistol


    CH3NO2
    CH3NO2

  5. #45
    The Colt 1911 has a flaw. The trigger lock safety could be better placed.

    this is probably the best example I know of.
    Thread root diameter and angle of the thread cut(not the pitch) hasn't changed in 150 plus years. All threads, whether metric, Whitworth, or SAE, course and fine, all follow the same basic engineering that was layout almost 2 centuries ago, and it hasn't been improved upon. Methods to from threads have improved, but the geometry has remained the same.
    Even the thread pitch(threads per inch) is very similar throughout the world. They may call it threads per millimeter, but the count is extremely close. You can duplicate most metric threads on a American made lath using preset thread settings.
    Westernearo may be able clarify that. But this has remain unchanged pretty much since the day one.


    A nut from the civil war will thread on a bolt made today.

    Last edited by gn7; 01-25-2014 at 05:19 PM.

  6. #46
    Everything is pretty much all about the nuts and bolts.

  7. #47
    WESTERNAERO
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by gn7 View Post
    The Colt 1911 has a flaw. The trigger lock safety could be better placed.

    this is probably the best example I know of.
    Thread root diameter and angle of the thread cut(not the pitch) hasn't changed in 150 plus years. All threads, whether metric, Whitworth, or SAE, course and fine, all follow the same basic engineering that was layout almost 2 centuries ago, and it hasn't been improved upon. Methods to from threads have improved, but the geometry has remained the same.
    Even the thread pitch(threads per inch) is very similar throughout the world. They may call it threads per millimeter, but the count is extremely close. You can duplicate most metric threads on a American made lath using preset thread settings.
    Westernearo may be able clarify that. But this has remain unchanged pretty much since the day one.


    A nut from the civil war will thread on a bolt made today.

    Nice job Bob. The only thing I would change about what you said is metric threads aren't designated by threads per millimeter per say. Metric thread pitch is a crest to crest measurement. So a 13mm x 2.0 means the threads are spaced 2.0mm apart. Multiply 2.0 by .03937 is .0787", so your feed rate on a lathe would be .0787.
    Last edited by WESTERNAERO; 01-26-2014 at 07:43 AM.

  8. #48

    A Real Math Question

    Quote Originally Posted by WESTERNAERO View Post
    Nice job Bob. The only thing I would change about what you said is metric threads aren't designated by threads per millimeter per say. Metric thread pitch is a crest to crest measurement. So a 13mm x 2.0 means the threads are spaced 2.0mm apart. Multiply .75 by .03937 is .0787", so your feed rate on a lathe would be .0787.
    How about 2.0 mm divided by 25.4 = .07874 or 25.4 X .07874 = 2mm.


    Math Question: What is the square root of "69"??? Eight (Ate) Something... 8.3066

  9. #49
    WESTERNAERO
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by nowski View Post
    How about 2.0 mm divided by 25.4 = .07874 or 25.4 X .07874 = 2mm.


    Math Question: What is the square root of "69"??? Eight (Ate) Something... 8.3066
    Yep, same thing. Some use divide by 25.4 and some use multiply by .03937.
    Fixed my earlier post. For some reason I put .75 x .03937, was supposed to be 2.0.

  10. #50
    Skilsaw -77 (especially if you're right handed lol)

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •