The only Political Thread on Www.Hotboat.Com

[2manymustangs]

Shall we add to her list of character traits?

62397

62400
...........

https://youtu.be/9QnmilCVzdw

https://youtu.be/e2f13f2awK4

[rioracr]

with the background of the Clinton machine and Trump running against her if she is not prosicuted, word out he may have an accident so there history
is not brought out and Trump is elected which means he may put a AG in that would go after the barry o administation of corruption.......

[The Doctor]

Since obamacare is still confusing, years after its implementation, I thought it appropriate to provide a basic explanation.

62415

Oh, and if you can't afford it, which hundreds of thousands cannot, you get fined.
Thank democrats everywhere.

[The Doctor]

Since we have some here who will still vote Killary, despite all her corruption, lies, incompetence and lack of accomplishments, I thought it appropriate we share this reminder:

62425

[314joey]

#neverhillary

[riverrunner1984]

62430.......

[The Doctor]

Feel the Bern???

62438

[The Doctor]

And you limp-wristed are still standing in her court? How sad for you?

62439

[314joey]

Another poll came out that showed Trump ahead of Shillary, maybe the country has a chance.

[The Doctor]

Awesome yard signs!

62446

[314joey]

This is hard to figure out.

[2manymustangs]

Awesome yard signs!

62446

aaahahahahahaha

[2manymustangs]

A lawyer for a top State Department official repeatedly objected to questions about Hillary Clinton's private email address during a deposition earlier this month.

The transcript, released on Monday by conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch, documented June 3 testimony from Ambassador Stephen D. Mull. The ambassador previously served as executive secretary of the State Department during Clinton's tenure.

"When did you first become aware of Mrs. Clinton — the email address Mrs. Clinton was using to conduct official government business?" asked Michael Bekesha, lawyer for Judicial Watch during the deposition.

"Objection," interjected Mull's lawyer, Steven Myers. "Value. It's vague, and it's ambiguous."

When informed by Bekesha that he could answer, Mull said it was a "difficult question to answer" because he wasn't sure he "ever really became aware" that Clinton was using a private email address for official government business.

Asked about a message where "H" was listed as the sender of an email on which he was copied, Mull said that he did not "definitively" know whom the email was from.

"Based on the body of the email, does it — it appears as though H would refer to Mrs. Clinton?" Bekesha asked.

"Objection," interjected Myers. "Is there a question?"

"Based — after reviewing the entire email, do you think that the H refers to Mrs. Clinton?" Bekesha rephrased.

"Objection," Myers said again. "Calls for speculation."

When told that he was allowed to answer the question, Mull said he wasn't quite sure if the "H" referred to Clinton.

"I — I don't know," he said. "That's a reasonable assumption, but I — I don't know for a fact who would have received something at the H email."

Bekesha next asked Mull about an email sent from then State Department legal adviser Harold Koh. The message was sent to Mull and Clinton, among others.

"So this was an email from the State Department's legal adviser. Is that correct?" the Judicial Watch lawyer asked.

"Objection," Myers said. "The document speaks for itself. And I also object for lack of personal knowledge and foundation."

"You may answer the question," Bekesha said.

"It appears so, yes," Mull replied.

"OK. Would email sent by the legal — the legal adviser to the State Department usually get lost? Are those emails you would usually read?" Bekesha pressed.

"Objection," Myers said. "Vague. It calls for speculation."

Bekesha rephrased slightly, asking Myers if he would "tend to read" an email from the agency's legal adviser, given the fact the "Executive Secretariat was fast paced" and he "may have received a lot of emails."

"Objection," Myers said again. "Vague."

Mull said that he would "make an effort" to read an email from the department's legal adviser.

"But you don't recall seeing this specific email when it came in?" Bekesha asked.

"Objection," Myers said. "Asked and answered."

"You may answer the question," Bekesha advised.

"No," Mull said.

"OK. And you don't recall seeing HDR22@Clintonemail.com when you received it?" Bekesha asked.

"Objection," Myers interjected. "Also asked and answered."

Mull ultimately said that he didn't recall seeing the address.


:cowdodo: bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla :cowdodo:

It's because of this very type of BS that Bernie is getting traction with the younger generation, and its because of this very type of BS that Trump is resonating with the folks FED UP with the establishment squandering our tax dollars AND caving into special interest...

[2manymustangs]

The filing from Bryan Pagliano came in response to a judge's directive to disclose details of the immunity agreement, which Pagliano said he entered into after cooperating in December with the Justice Department's ongoing investigation into Clinton's server.

Though Pagliano has spoken with the Justice Department, he has invoked his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination in refusing to answer questions from Congress and reiterated Tuesday that he would not give testimony in an ongoing lawsuit brought by conservative legal advocacy group Judicial Watch.

"The DOJ has not authorized a grant of immunity for Mr. Pagliano in connection with any other matter, including this civil case," Pagliano's attorneys wrote in a court filing.

Pagliano received limited "use" and "derivative use" immunity from the Justice Department, his lawyers wrote. That type of immunity generally protects witnesses from having statements they make to investigators being used against them in any criminal case — with the exception of lies or false statements — while still enabling the government to prosecute using evidence it obtains independent of that testimony.

[HB Vic]

I did my part, did you? [emoji631]

62790


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2manymustangs]

I did my part, did you? [emoji631]

62790


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

:thumb:

[2manymustangs]

Can a charter member of "NCLR/La Raza" provide a UNbiased ruling/perspective in a Donald Trump case??? Such as Federal Judge Gonzalo Curiel or top staffer Cecilia Muñoz???


Read up on "NCLR/La Raza" and their history before you answer.................... Maybe Trump isn't so off base asking for a change of venue???

[ChumpChange]

Since obamacare is still confusing, years after its implementation, I thought it appropriate to provide a basic explanation.

62415

Oh, and if you can't afford it, which hundreds of thousands cannot, you get fined.
Thank democrats everywhere.

And after you're dead.....lol

[2manymustangs]

Expose these dirt bags... BLECH...

62795

Return with us now to the saga of Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the soul of the Democratic Party.

First, a quick recap: Rep. Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), chair of the Democratic National Committee, also has been an advocate for the payday loan industry. The website Think Progress even described her as the “top Democratic ally” of “predatory payday lenders.” You know — the bottom-feeding bloodsuckers of the working poor. Yes, them.

Low-income workers living from paycheck to paycheck, especially women and minorities, are the payday lenders’ prime targets — easy pickings because they’re often desperate. Twelve million Americans reportedly borrow nearly $50 billion a year through payday loans, at rates that can soar above 300 percent, sometimes even beyond 500 percent. Bethany McLean at The Atlantic recently reported that the government’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) studied millions of payday loans and found that “67 percent went to borrowers with seven or more transactions a year and that a majority of those borrowers paid more in fees than the amount of their initial loan.”

Yet when the CFPB was drawing up new rules to make it harder for payday predators to feast on the poor, Rep. Wasserman Schultz co-sponsored a bill to delay those new rules by two years. How, you ask, could the head of the party’s national committee embrace such an appalling exploitation of working people?


http://observer.com/2016/06/debbie-wasserman-schultzs-payday-loan-flip-flop-cant-save-her-job/

[314joey]

I'm not a super Trump fan, but will vote for him any day before voting for crooked Shillary, her and Billy have been stealing from the American people for 25 years, when are people going to wake up.

[The Doctor]

Maybe a democrat here could explain this to me?

62797

[The Doctor]

Who cares if it's photo-shopped. It's spot on!

62798

[314joey]

Love'm

[2manymustangs]

Is this picture Hillary???

62802

[314joey]

What's next

[riverrunner1984]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160615/5500042350ad5504e4d471a3fa50ccbc.jpg

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160615/0c19c073467f891bea39551ca4248e50.jpg

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160615/06ec34cfcc4b2683672800ec5f3ba563.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[The Doctor]

Liberal logic . . .


63189

[2manymustangs]

You might be a "progressive" if:


You think Canadians buy no health insurance.

You believe companies provide free health care and retirement.

You believe that a venture firm CEO is doing his job if he keeps failing businesses open.

You believe the big money in the investment capital business is shutting down bankrupt businesses and selling their assets.

You think employees of money-losing businesses have the right to demand that investors keep them on the payroll.

You have never skipped a paycheck to ensure that your employees are paid on time.

You criticize Mitt Romney for having a grandfather who lived among polygamists (even though his grandfather had only one wife) but think Obama's bigamist father and polygamist grandfather are irrelevant.

You think the law of supply and demand affects prices except of oil and gasoline.

You think Vice-President Joe Biden is smarter than former VP Dick Cheney.

You think the governor who tried to keep nine black students out of a high school in Arkansas (The Little Rock Nine) was a Republican and the president who sent the Army to escort them into school was a Democrat.

You think Obama should claim credit for increased domestic oil production despite his three-year record of doing everything he could to reduce it.

You think investigators who concluded that Obama's Hawaii birth certificate is a forgery must be wrong because they are conservatives.

You don't demand to know why Obama's Social Security card was issued for a resident of Connecticut, a state where he never lived.

You think Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona is unqualified to lead an investigation of Obama's U.S. citizenship though he worked for 25 years as an investigator for the Drug Enforcement Administration.

You thought Bush's college grades were a matter of national concern but accept Obama's secrecy over his college papers.

You think Sunday talk shows are balanced when a token conservative is filibustered by three or four liberals, including the host.

You care about racial diversity in the major news media but don't care that 90 percent of their reporters vote Democrat.

You support politicians who want to put coal miners, military personnel and oil field workers on unemployment but hate politicians who want to get rid of overpaid bureaucrats.

You call raising taxes "investing in our future" unless the money is spent on the military.

You think it's OK to ban schools from holding bake sales to raise money because the government has a duty to enforce dieting.

You praise Hillary Clinton for eschewing makeup but think Republican women who wear ordinary clothes are frumpy.

You praise Bill Clinton for his greatest accomplishment — welfare reform — but hate Republicans for fighting Obama's "wealth redistribution."

You blame George Bush for the bank deregulation bill signed by Bill Clinton.

You cite his fancy garage as proof that Mitt Romney is out of touch but thought nothing of John Kerry's multiple mansions worth $33 million.

You were upset with the money Sarah Palin spent on her wardrobe but see nothing wrong with Michelle Obama's spending twice as much.

You oppose a fence on our southern border but live in a gated community.

You think churches should not be exempt from taxes.

You cheered when your candidate said "Bush" but insist that others show respect by saying "President Obama."

Your chief argument for opposing oil extraction in the Arctic 10 years ago was that it would take too long — 10 years — to produce oil.

You think people who defend themselves with guns are violent nut cases who were looking for trouble.

You still think John Edwards would have been a better vice-president than Dick Cheney.

You see Obama's Harvard degree as evidence of vastly superior intelligence, but you think Bush is an idiot though he's the only president to have earned an M.B.A. (from Harvard).

You might be liberal if you think conservatives are racists for opposing Obama's radical socialism.

You think Christians are a bigger threat than radical Islamist fascists.

You think the media should not run pix reminding us of what terrorists did on 9-11 but excuse pix of our soldiers posing w dead suicide bombers.

You think of Michael Moore as a hero because people had to pay $14 million for tickets to see his movie opposing capitalism.

You have the hair and beard of Jesus and the work ethic of the town drunk.

You're against people who intimidate at polling places unless they're New Black Panthers.

Your views are constantly evolving when you lack courage to take a stand.

You think George Clooney, Roseann Barr, Sean Penn and Barbra Streisand know more about the military, taxes and the economy than any Republican.

You call for respectful dialogue, then call Republicans "Nazis," "baby killers," "war criminals," "rich white men who want dirty air and dirty water," "sluts," "imbeciles" and "flat earthers."

You pour blood on women wearing fur but cry foul when pro-lifers show pictures of a murdered fetus to women considering abortion.

You think we should have believed Saddam Hussein but we should not believe Ahmadinejad.

You get your news from the Comedy Central and Saturday Night Live.

You oppose racial hatred but practice class hatred.

You think anybody with a job is rich.

You think you're charitable by taking my money to pay for your programs.

You might be liberal if you think conservatives are racists for opposing Obama's radical socialism.

You look just like all the other nonconformists you idolize.

You thank the lamestream media for refusing to run pictures of people jumping off the Twin Towers while excusing them for running pictures of Americans posing with dead suicide bombers.

You like giving billions of tax dollars to failing solar panel companies but want to tax successful oil companies out of business.

You aborted your baby but want to saddle my baby with your debts.

Your chief goal is to get a bigger check from the government.

You think the lamestream media is unbiased.

You have ever arranged to get yourself laid off so that you could beach bum, ski or go fishing on unemployment checks.

You think Obama's college documents should be private but Mitt Romney's tax returns should be public.

You believed candidate Obama when he said he opposed gay marriage.

You think taxpayers are not paying their fair share if their tax rate is higher than yours.

You think it's OK to call Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann and Ann Coulter sluts but wrong to call a slut a slut.

You think a 10 percent return is an obscene profit for the oil industry but a 15 percent tax on oil companies is low.

You don't want your daughter "punished with a baby."

You think the Democrats can choose my charities better than I can.

You hate SUVs but love Chevy Volts.

You call yourself open-minded but won't watch Fox News or Hannity and won't tune into Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, Michael Savage or any other conservative talk show.

Jerry Springer supports your candidates.

Your favorite part of Obama's health insurance plan is that it doubles or triples premiums on vets and active-duty military.

You're 30 years old and live in your mother's basement.

You think we can solve our nation's debt problems by borrowing more money.

You think the government can do a better job of picking your health insurance plan than you can.

You want higher taxes on everybody else but refuse to pay more taxes voluntarily.

Prostitutes, strippers, pornographers, drug dealers and deadbeats oppose the same candidates you hate.

You signed a mortgage you know you can't afford and then blame the bank.

You don't believe in God or Jesus but curse by invoking their names.

You want a government agency such as the TSA deciding on your health care.

You've chained yourself to a bulldozer to prevent it from thinning pinyon-juniper cover for improved wildlife habitat.

You spent more on your pet's wardrobe than you donated to charity in an entire year.

You think you're smarter than Karl Rove, Marco Rubio, Rush Limbaugh, George Bush, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and Condoleeza Rice.

You know nothing about Thomas Paine or Alexander Hamilton but everything about Kim Kardsashian.

You consider yourself open to other cultures except the culture of the Bible Belt.

You honor and respect the sacred places and religious practices of voodoo worshippers, native Americans, Muslims, Wicaans and New Age worshippers but despise and mock those of Protestants, Mormons and Catholics.

If you hyphenated your last name with that of your spouse.

You think I must accept your opinions to show tolerance while you shout me down or call me a name usually reserved for genitalia.

You were disappointed when Dick Cheney got a heart transplant.

You think freedom of religion means freedom from religion.

You think Mitt Romney wasn't paying his fair share when he paid the federal income $10 million in taxes.

You still consider Obama a uniter rather than a divider.

"In God We Trust" on U.S. coins offends you.

You think a health insurance bill will reduce the cost of medical care.

Your legs are hairier than your boyfriend's.

You believe Bill Clinton that he smoked marijuana but never inhaled.

You gave more to the ACLU than your local church.

You think stay-at-home moms never had a real job.

You hate capitalism but want a capitalist to give you a job.

You are among the 50 percent of Americans who pay no federal income tax.

You think everybody but you should be forced to drive a glorified golf cart.

You oppose highway projects funded by gas taxes paid by drivers, yet you favor mass transit projects that are built with tax money taken involuntarily from citizens who always drive.

You call me names for sticking to facts.

You believe that People for the American Way believe in what made America great.

You think standardized tests are racist but racial quotas are not.

You resort to calling your opponent a racist when you're losing a debate.

You like governmental programs that make you feel good even when you know they don't work.

You think Al Gore is smarter than George Bush.

You think that the top 10 percent of income earners aren't paying enough taxes when they pay 73 percent of total income tax revenues.

You think Obama is the most intelligent president in history.

You want George Zimmerman lynched before his trial.

You hate capitalism because you can't get a job for your tattoos and fluorescent green mohawk.

Howard Stern, Hugh Hefner and Larry Flynt share your views.

You think a good investment of your tax money is to fund green companies that can't compete in the open market.

You criticized Bush for invading Iraq with UN approval but cheered Clinton for invading Haiti and Bosnia without UN approval.

You apologize for America's wars to defeat despots who take away freedom.

You never did your own research and thinking on what your leftist professors told you.

You never read news that make conservatives look good or liberals look bad because your only newspaper is The New York Times and your only magazine is Newsweek.

When tallying the innocent lives lost in Iraq, you include only those accidentally killed by Americans and not the hundreds of thousands intentionally murdered by Saddam and his thugs.

The only windows in your church are openings between the trees.

You don't believe the swift boat sailors who said John Kerry was a fraud.

"You think selling guns to Mexican drug lords is good but to law-abiding Americans is bad."

You think "An Inconvenient Truth" deserved an Oscar.

You think paying more than $200,000 a year to a school district superintendent will help Johnny read.

You think the Ice Age ended because cavemen's fires raised carbon levels and caused global warming.

You believe Dan Rather's forged documents on George Bush's military service.

You think prisons should have racial quotas.

You think marijuana is a beneficial herb.

You think Republicans want dirty air and polluted water.

You poohpooh Christianity but promote witchcraft and earth worship.

You think the Supreme Court elected George Bush.

You think corporate profits are bad but corporate taxes are good.

You think drinking bottled water will save endangered gorillas.

You think gun control will take guns from criminals.

You dispute a judge's findings that "An Inconvenient Truth" contained at least nine major falsehoods.

You call Columbus a genocidal maniac but Che a noble leader.

You think socialism will work if we give it another try.

You agree with Obama cabinet member Anita Dunn that mass murderer Mao Tse Tung is a philosopher worthy of admiration and respect.

You believe Al Gore that global warming will melt sea ice and raise sea levels 20 feet to 67 meters even though the level in your soda glass drops when your ice cubes melt.

You look just like all the other noncomformists you idolize.

You think illegal drugs should be legalized and fattening foods should be banned.

You blame the United States for the cruelty of Christopher Columbus even though he died 270 years before the Declaration of Independence.

You wear a bull ring in your nose and tribal plugs in your ears.

You think it's OK to kick kids out of school for wearing a U.S. flag shirt on Cinco de Mayo.

You worry more about criminal rights than victim rights.

You're ashamed to wear a U.S. flag label pin.

You'll quote a single doctor that cocaine and heroin are harmless if taken in "moderation" but think that millions of doctors who disagree are uninformed demagogues.

You think Steve Jobs deserved his wealth while other CEOs do not.

You never find out what news isn't covered by the New York Times or the major networks.

You think millionaires should pay a higher tax rate instead of reducing the tax rate of their secretaries.

You want more wind generators unless you can see them from your house.

You call U.S. soldiers baby killers but support doctors who slice and dice or suck the brains out of babies about to be born.

You want to legalize marijuana but outlaw tobacco.

You support Al Gore and celebrities who fly around in private jets to scaremonger the public over global warming.

You think the government should supply Korans to inmates but should keep Bibles out of the reach of schoolchildren.

You call Lincoln a racist even though he emancipated the slaves.

You think sanctions on rogue nations, after 40 years of accomplishing nothing, will work this time.

You hate NASCAR but love hybrids.

You think animals have human rights, but you wear leather shoes.

You think Obama is well deserving of the Nobel Peace prize even after he invaded Libya and had Osama bin Laden shot on sight rather than captured even though he was unarmed.

You think that Americans were wrong to invade Iraq after Saddam Hussein reneged on letting UN inspectors verify his claims that he had stopped making weapons of mass destruction.

You think the Berlin Wall kept West Germans from escaping.

You think President Bush and Dick Cheney lied when repeating findings of international intelligence operations but General Colin Powell was innocently fooled.

You think Al Qaeda should be allowed to recruit but the U.S. military should not.

You believe sexual accusations against Clarence Thomas but not those against Bill Clinton.

You support a woman's right to choose unless she chooses to have a baby or give it up for adoption.

You think criminals should get sure and swift punishment by being forced to see a counselor one hour a month (except for racists, who should get life).

You hate rich people but love the Kennedys, John Kerry, Barack Obama, Jesse Jackson and Warren Buffet.

You're happy to see thousands of jobs cut in military arms factories but celebrate the hundreds of "not so shovel ready" jobs created by Obama's deficit spending.

You won't risk your life to print a cartoon of Muhammad but deride what Mormons hold sacred.

You object to nativity scenes but support public funding for artists who produce "artwork" defaming Jesus Christ.

You think artwork of the Ten Commandments should be banned from courthouses (including the Supreme Court building), but public schools should be forced to teach your morals.

You think patriotism is a dirty word.

You think rioters in France are African-American.

You think America should defend itself from terrorists as long as it doesn't kill them without the approval of France and Russia.

You think bigotry is wrong unless the victim is white, Christian, Mormon or conservative.

You hate Juan Williams for being afraid when Muslims get on his plane.

You admire Obama for refusing to say that his Super PAC should return $1 million from Bill Maher for calling successful conservative women nasty names.

You admire Ed Schultz for saying he saw "abolutely nothing wrong" with Secret Service agents hiring prostitutes.

You think diversity is good in the mass news media as long as there are no conservative reporters.

You think the federal government should take money from American workers to support foreign governments.

You oppose people who eat the deer they kill but eat the cattle that others kill.

You support multiple use on public land as long as it does not include activities you don't like.

You think the government should pay for your state's symphony ochestra so that you can afford to listen to it once every five years.

You think Bush invaded Iraq for his buddies in the oil business.

You think Obama is willing to compromise when he accuses Republicans of refusing to compromise.

You think teaching morality in schools is evil but requiring students to read "Daddy has a husband" is good.

You think the U.S. should return the Southwest to Mexico, which stole it from the Indians.

You think Republicans, not Democrats, blocked civil rights legislation in the '50s and '60s.

You oppose involving parents in teenagers' decision to have abortions.

You think people should be allowed to commit suicide but not to eat fast food.

You can't see racism in rap songs about killing white folks.

You were opposed to Hollywood's blackballing of communists but love the mainstream media's blackballing of conservative journalists.

You think the TSA should randomly perform intensive and invasive searches of 75-year-old women in wheelchairs they're not giving extra scrutiny to young Arab "tourists" with one-way tickets.

You think Cheney approved the invasion of Iraq so that Halliburton could send its employees to help rebuild the country.

You think black Americans should receive reparations for slavery from people who hate slavery and who have no ancestors who owned slaves.

"Think women should not listen to their husbands but should listen to liberal feminists.

You think you should force school children to eat food that you consider healthful but parents should not give children apple juice or peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

You think cow farts are melting the ice caps.

You blame society for the actions of criminals and want to punish society by letting criminals go free.

You think the best way to reduce the poverty gap is to put the middle class closer to poverty instead of helping the poor get jobs.

You think glaciers growing in the Himalayas are the result of global warming.

You think the culprit in the Clinton-Lewinsky affair was the woman who revealed the blue dress.

You believe Democrats who say Republicans have not proposed any solutions.

You think Obama shows true patriotism by refusing to place his hand over his heart when the flag is raised.

You think the right to free speech means the right to shout out people with whom you disagree.

You voted for Obama because he said he would close the Guantanamo terrorist prison but support him for keeping it open.

You think Occupy Wall Street has a legitimate complaint when the group refuses to take an official stand on anything.

You don't mind Obama's communist and socialist advisers.

You think the Rev. Jeremiah Wright started his anti-white, anti-American racist rants only after Obama attended his services for 20 years.

You think Obama finally chose a church 25 years ago because the Rev. Jeremiah Wright would lead him to Christ.

You think your first amendment rights are threatened if people criticize your ideas.

You say America should conquer its addiction to foreign oil but oppose nuclear power, hydroelectric dams, coal-fired electric generators, drilling for more oil in the U.S. and any source that can realistically power the country.

You think copies of Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate are real while copies of his Kenyan birth certificate are fake.

You don't believe Obama's African grandmother that she remembers when Barrack was born in Kenya.

You think Obama won't let people see his school transcripts because he's modest.

You want to hear other views until they are voiced.

You think bureaucrats know more about how to teach your children about sex than you do.

You support distributing free condoms to elementary and middle school students.

You think Cuba has better health care than the U.S.

You think Michael Moore produces documentaries instead of mockumentaries and fake-umentaries.

You named your baby Barack.

You believe George Bush and his goons planned and carried out the destruction of the Twin Towers so that he could blame it on Muslims and then invade Iraq to raise gas prices.

You think "all men are created equal" means they should get equal pay for unequal work.

You think Obama is the fourth best president ever.

You vote for members of Congress who voted for Obamacare before they read it.

You think communists should be able to say whatever they want in public universities but that conservative talk show hosts should be banned.

You honor and respect the sacred places and religious practices of voodoo worshippers, native Americans, Muslims, wiccans and New Age worshippers but despise and mock those of Protestants, Mormons and Catholics.

You want Christmas trees renamed holiday trees or banned from public view but tell those who object to pornography to look the other way.

You find the right to commit sodomy in the Constitution but can't find the right to bear arms or my right to practice religion without interference from you.

You think illegal aliens should have the right to vote without showing identification but support Al Gore's attempt to ignore absentee ballots from soldiers serving our country overseas.

You think the right to free speech applies only to people with your views but not to "insane conservatives," religious leaders or "crazy gun nuts."

You want Obama on Rushmore.

You would rather see deer starve rather than allow hunters to keep their numbers in balance with their food supply.

You think that in areas where whites are minorities, they deserve no minority protections.

You think Castro, Saddam Hussein, Hamas, Putin and Hugo Chaves were fairly elected but George Bush was not.

You think Obama merely misspoke when he said he had visited 57 states, while Dan Quayle was stupid for misspelling "potatoes," or was it "potatos"?

You admire President Obama for expanding the pool of prospective employees but thought 4% unemployment under George Bush was too high.

You automatically vote against candidates endorsed by the NRA or the Tea Party but support candidates who are favored by the Communist Party, socialists or Al Qaeda.

You've never met anybody who voted for John McCain.

You think the United States should give back lands it won in the war with Mexico, but Robert Mugabe should keep the ranches he stole from white farmers.

You support anybody who rebels against democracy but oppose any group that rebels against vicious dictators who repress their people and violate human rights.

You think the Obama administration is the most transparent in history.

You think our best and most moral presidents were FDR, JFK and Clinton, while you hate and distrust our presidents who have never been accused of cheating on their wives.

You think capitalism causes poverty.

You think communism is fair because people can't earn extra by doing extra work or better work.

You don't want Christians to impose their morality on you, but you think you should impose your morality on them.

You think there's no such thing as right and wrong except to believe there's such a thing as right and wrong.

You think a stay-at-home mom "never worked a day in her life."

Your donations to charity amount roughly to the same percentage as those given by Joe Biden or Al Gore, which is next to nothing.

You think it's wrong to award a Little League trophy to the first place team.

You like president who will negotiate with terrorists but refuse to compromise with Republicans.

You can't tell the difference between a balanced news report and a conservative opinion.

You think the only balanced news shows the liberal viewpoint and the left-wing radical viewpoint.

You think a conservative guest on a liberal talk show should never have the last word.

You dispute facts but never theories.

You call conservatives names because their viewpoint differs from your own.

You think public schools should help students get abortions without notifying parents.

You think home invaders should not be shot.

You support Obama's threats to rogue nations only if the consequence is more threats.

You don't like this page.

[The Doctor]

That was awesome because it perfectly describes some that post or posted here.

[shueman]

This is going to be a fun summer :)

http://www.performanceboats.com/gallery/data/961/clown-1.gif

[The Doctor]

This is going to be a fun summer :)

Care to tell us who you are voting for between Killary and Trump? Trump for me.

[2manymustangs]

Care to tell us who you are voting for between Killary and Trump? Trump for me.

I can answer that..... It wont be Killary, she is getting fitted/measured/weighed/shod/deloused/curry combed/hoofs trimmed/teeth filed/made ready for her prison orange jump suits as you read this. She will be pressing Arizona license plates when THE DONALD is sworn it...


WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is not generally thought of as a friend of Republicans. But what he says is coming soon from his whistleblowing group could endear him to the GOP. Assange claims his "upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton" are enough to indict her, according to a recent interview with British ITV News.

"We've accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton. We could proceed to an indictment," he said. These emails are "pending publication."

But no matter how damaging the emails are, Assange believes the FBI will give Clinton a pass. Rather than bring criminal charges, it will "push for concessions from the new Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment."

If that happens, then the FBI will have committed a criminal offense. Letting a politician escape indictment simply because he or she has power and status is an outrage that every American should strongly condemn. But, as Assange points out, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, an Obama appointee, isn't likely to indict someone who once worked for her boss, and is a fellow Democrat.

There is also the fact, admitted to by Clinton's campaign, that Clinton fixer attorney David Kendall has stayed in contact with the Justice Department throughout its investigation.

[314joey]

No wonder they're confused.

[2manymustangs]

No wonder they're confused.

:LMAOsmiley: I almost forgot about the black chick that isn't... :LMAOsmiley:

[riverrunner1984]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160621/4afe953000d471f498dd38b6a1b3936f.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2manymustangs]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160621/4afe953000d471f498dd38b6a1b3936f.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

RR, this is my official response to OLAMEO on that topic....

>>>>> :fsakes <<<<<

I wish I had the time/energy/resources to quantify the HC cost situation...

All the folks that I know which have a CLEAR/TRUE picture of the FULLY loaded HC costs (before and after OBAMACARE) are telling me terrible horror stories about how much their HC insurance costs have skyrocketed...

A slightly tangential thought on this topic... My niece (Dr. of Psychology) had a super rough time getting out onto her own insurance several years back when OBAMACARE first came into being, she has since married a guy from Ireland and moved to Ireland (you know, where HC is FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE like Canada and other semi socialist countries). Her hubby would really brag on their HC system and the costs, but he never was sick and didn't have any back/pain issues since he is pretty young. HIS SISTER (living in Ireland) on the other hand has bad compression in her back and is nearly immobile due to what would/should be very basic back surgery. She can't get treatment and has literally been waiting two years at this point for basic back HC, which is typically done here on an outpatient basis... TRUE STORY...

P.S. 2 + years later she is doing volunteer work in Ireland to obtain some certification JUST so she can get a paying job... WITH A PHD...

[riverrunner1984]

RR, this is my official response to OLAMEO on that topic....

>>>>> :fsakes <<<<<

I wish I had the time/energy/resources to quantify the HC cost situation...

All the folks that I know which have a CLEAR/TRUE picture of the FULLY loaded HC costs (before and after OBAMACARE) are telling me terrible horror stories about how much their HC insurance costs have skyrocketed...

A slightly tangential thought on this topic... My niece (Dr. of Psychology) had a super rough time getting out onto her own insurance several years back when OBAMACARE first came into being, she has since married a guy from Ireland and moved to Ireland (you know, where HC is FREEEEEEEEEEEEEE like Canada and other semi socialist countries). Her hubby would really brag on their HC system and the costs, but he never was sick and didn't have any back/pain issues since he is pretty young. HIS SISTER (living in Ireland) on the other hand has bad compression in her back and is nearly immobile due to what would/should be very basic back surgery. She can't get treatment and has literally been waiting two years at this point for basic back HC, which is typically done here on an outpatient basis... TRUE STORY...

P.S. 2 + years later she is doing volunteer work in Ireland to obtain some certification JUST so she can get a paying job... WITH A PHD...

Mine has been up over 45% in the past 3-4 years.

[2manymustangs]

Mine has been up over 45% in the past 3-4 years.

Is that YOUR share of a group/work subsidized plan?

[riverrunner1984]

Is that YOUR share of a group/work subsidized plan?

Work pays 80% of mine and 50% of Kim's....
I am not sure 100% how it works out I just know when we have our yearly meeting, the numbers keep going up for every employee.
So I am guessing the whole group policy goes up.

[riverrunner1984]

Is that YOUR share of a group/work subsidized plan?

Oh and as of this year, our plan is no longer being accepted. This will be the 3rd time our plan has been eliminated and we need to get a new one.
So if we like our plan we could not keep it.

[2manymustangs]

Oh and as of this year, our plan is no longer being accepted. This will be the 3rd time our plan has been eliminated and we need to get a new one.
So if we like our plan we could not keep it.


But he said you could keep it if you like it...

:Lies:

I asked about % or shared cost/employer subsidized, I wager that they have increased the % they are paying as the prices keep going up up up... Sicking development for sure.......

[314joey]

I can't even think or talk about this Obummercare thing, it makes me soooooooooooooooooooo focking mad I could spit.

[2manymustangs]

I can't even think or talk about this Obummercare thing, it makes me soooooooooooooooooooo focking mad I could spit.

You mean your HC cost didnt go down? YOu weren't able to keep what you had BCUZ you liked it? Spill it JoeyJimmy...

[314joey]

Don't know much about the reports of increases coming in 2017, but from personnel experience we've been getting shafted since Obumercare took over.

King Obummer said we could keep our Doctor and the insurance we had...................big fat friggin' lie...........last year they made us give up the insurance plan I had for years and was happy with, now the stick in the eye, my Wife couldn't go to her Doctor she's had for over 20 years unless I wanted to pay for it myself out of pocket, he wasn't in Obumercare.

Not only that, but our premium almost doubled and the deductible went from $2,500 to $6,000, what a screw job we got.

So lets' see, I lose my policy, we lose our Doctors, but someone else gets free health insurance/care, seems fair to me, thanks Obumer.

[The Doctor]

I can't even think or talk about this Obummercare thing, it makes me soooooooooooooooooooo focking mad I could spit.

Thank democrats everywhere. Not a single republican voted for this catastrophe! NOT ONE!!!!

[314joey]

Thank democrats everywhere. Not a single republican voted for this catastrophe! NOT ONE!!!!

I know, plus they had to bribe a few dems and give them special add-ons to get their votes, it's all bullchit, jamming this chit down people faces, it's crazy.

[2manymustangs]

I know, plus they had to bribe a few dems and give them special add-ons to get their votes, it's all bullchit, jamming this chit down people faces, it's crazy.

Expect more of the same under Clintoon/Sanders...

[314joey]

Expect more of the same under Clintoon/Sanders...

I know, more bribes and extortion.

[2manymustangs]

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-kirchick-terrorism-cold-war-20160622-snap-story.html <<<< nice read...

[314joey]

This is hilarious and sad, but true.

[2manymustangs]

http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/obama-makes-global-warming-pitch-yosemite-40-car-motorcade/

[2manymustangs]

Biden speaks for the entire U.S.????????????????????????????????? not.................

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, traveling in Ireland, said the United States would have preferred that Britain had voted to remain in the European Union, but respected the result.

"I must say we had looked for a different outcome. We would have preferred a different outcome ... but the United States has a long-standing friendship with the United Kingdom and that very special bond will endure,” he said in a speech in Dublin.

IF Biden and Obama are against the pull out of the EU, rest assured it will be the right thing to do long term...

[Mrs.K034]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160625/2f53a98f5162219fb0031f7f860374a1.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HB Vic]

omg that is sooooo disgusting LOL

[2manymustangs]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160625/2f53a98f5162219fb0031f7f860374a1.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

:wink2:

[Mrs.K034]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160625/99c948abb4861c2410c51549f02123db.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[314joey]

Kind of tells it all.

[ChumpChange]

I'll just leave these here.
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160627/0cef3ad503511a01da284e241cb52e8d.jpg
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160627/3a81b0dbfc9df7d59c7dacfc926c23f1.jpg
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160627/b7b78d3f5fbf1e6318509f647b8628dd.jpg

[2manymustangs]

I'll just leave these here.
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160627/b7b78d3f5fbf1e6318509f647b8628dd.jpg

:LMAOsmiley: I saw the same thing, her fashion consultant is a major FAILURE!!!!

[2manymustangs]

63386

eeeeeeeeeeek

[2manymustangs]

Ready to indict??? http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/25/exclusive-darrell-issa-there-is-enough-evidence-to-indict-hillary-clinton/ (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/25/exclusive-darrell-issa-there-is-enough-evidence-to-indict-hillary-clinton/)

63387

[314joey]

Hillary as just one of us common folk in her $12K jacket.

http://www.worldtribune.com/hillary-gives-speech-on-inequality-in-a-12000-armani-jacket/

[2manymustangs]

Hillary as just one of us common folk in her $12K jacket.

http://www.worldtribune.com/hillary-gives-speech-on-inequality-in-a-12000-armani-jacket/

And her $3500 hand bag...

[riverrunner1984]

Ready to indict??? http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/25/exclusive-darrell-issa-there-is-enough-evidence-to-indict-hillary-clinton/ (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/25/exclusive-darrell-issa-there-is-enough-evidence-to-indict-hillary-clinton/)

63387

I cant see Lynch's justice dept. inditing Killary.....

One theory I heard is that if they do Indite her, it will be after the convention.
According to the convention rules, if the nominee is no longer able to run, the DNC gets to pick the replacement and the replacement will be Biden....
Who the hell knows though......

#trumptrain2016

[2manymustangs]

I cant see Lynch's justice dept. inditing Killary.....

One theory I heard is that if they do Indite her, it will be after the convention.
According to the convention rules, if the nominee is no longer able to run, the DNC gets to pick the replacement and the replacement will be Biden....
Who the hell knows though......

#trumptrain2016

Rest assured , we've hit rock bottom with OlameO... It can't get any worse...


63388

[314joey]

I just don't understand how anyone can vote for this shrew.

[The Doctor]

He needs a lot more bad weeks. . .

63390

[2manymustangs]

He needs a lot more bad weeks. . .

63390

The pundits/leftwingers in the U.S. are going to goad the UK into voting again and again until they "get it right" on the EU exit... :wink2:

[314joey]

The main stream media is complicit.

[riverrunner1984]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160629/158be138d6ea4fea7129770d12f00ee3.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[314joey]

Love the MEMEs

[JohnnyRotten]

.
63395

[The Doctor]

Really?

63396

[2manymustangs]

Really?

63396

aaaaaaaahahahahahahahaahhhhhahahahah!!!!!!!!!

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/06/30/Bernie-Sanders-supporters-sue-Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz-DNC-for-fraud/7411467293953/ (http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2016/06/30/Bernie-Sanders-supporters-sue-Debbie-Wasserman-Schultz-DNC-for-fraud/7411467293953/)

[The Doctor]

Heber, AZ has a giant 4th weekend celebration, starting with a huge parade. These small towns understand politics as you can see by those involved in the parade.

63410

63411

[spike morelli]

Really?

63396
EXACTLY! You know, even though Mr. Sanders wasn't my choice for the job, I think he, along with Mr. Trump, had a handle on how corrupt our government has become. Now, he's throwing his lot in with the dirty laundry of Clit-on.....how sad for Americans. On THAT note, I feel the thing to remember is not whether you lean Democrat or Republican, you should always vote as an AMERICAN first, putting America first.

[314joey]

. On THAT note, I feel the thing to remember is not whether you lean Democrat or Republican, you should always vote as an AMERICAN first, putting America first.

Yup, me too.

[The Doctor]

EXACTLY! You know, even though Mr. Sanders wasn't my choice for the job, I think he, along with Mr. Trump, had a handle on how corrupt our government has become. Now, he's throwing his lot in with the dirty laundry of Clit-on.....how sad for Americans. On THAT note, I feel the thing to remember is not whether you lean Democrat or Republican, you should always vote as an AMERICAN first, putting America first.

Thinking America always have. It's liberal America that is ruining us.

[314joey]

Thinking America always have. It's liberal America that is ruining us.

Yup...............especially Shillary, it scares me who would even think about voting for her, anybody but her.

[The Doctor]

More to think about . . .

63417

63418

[314joey]

Hillary can't even do a simple J-O-B

[The Doctor]

The fix is in . . . it's really that simple.

63425

[The Doctor]

Today's FBI ruling proved corruption has overrun this administration. Can you imagine if Bush had done a small fraction of what she has?

63426

[HB Vic]

Its so fucking hard to sit back and not say anything about this when what happened was just so fucking wrong.

Talk about a major loss of what little confidence I had left in our "American" justice system. Pathetic doesn't even come close to the tragedy that was shoved down our throats.

I think we should declare yesterday "Commit a felony free pass day" for the entire fucking country.

Disgusting.

[2manymustangs]

Its so fucking hard to sit back and not say anything about this when what happened was just so fucking wrong.

Talk about a major loss of what little confidence I had left in our "American" justice system. Pathetic doesn't even come close to the tragedy that was shoved down our throats.

I think we should declare yesterday "Commit a felony free pass day" for the entire fucking country.

Disgusting.

I feel that this UNDERSCORES/highlights the movement on both sides... to break down the ESTABLISHMENT on both sides like a double barrel shotgun and :leghump:

by kicking the establishment wonkers & wigglets to the curb... I think that is what the bernie/trump supporters are telling the establishment, " F.U.... "

Look at the backroom dealmakers on the GOP side that are saying they will vote for Hillary rather than Trump... Tells me exactly where their hearts are...


We all need to be honest with ourselves and say NO to the establishment on both sides, they are slimy self serving bastads for the most part and need to be flushed...

[The Doctor]

Its so fucking hard to sit back and not say anything about this when what happened was just so fucking wrong.

Talk about a major loss of what little confidence I had left in our "American" justice system. Pathetic doesn't even come close to the tragedy that was shoved down our throats.

I think we should declare yesterday "Commit a felony free pass day" for the entire fucking country.

Disgusting.

Here's an option that I took today:
james.comey@ic.fbi.gov
James,
I'm beyond saddened to see our laws have application to some and not for the Clintons. You have weakened a nation with your decision and now compromise all of our nation's rule of law. There are clear violations and others have paid a heavy price for committing the same crimes that this dangerous woman is guilty of. Your explanation is weak, at best and it defines a clear double standard of the FBI in its enforcement. Shame on you, even if you were threatened by these dangerous people. You represent a nation with laws and you have failed this nation with your representation. Now, you must decide which criminals are subject to our laws and which are exempt. Good luck with that Mr. Comey.
Sincerely,
Bobby Miller - just another patriot

[The Doctor]

The hits just keep on coming . . .

63432

63433

63434

[The Doctor]

Thank heavens, they are on it . . .

63435

[2manymustangs]

Thank heavens, they are on it . . .

63435

Do you mean this???

63436

[The Doctor]

She's the perfect democrat . . .

63437

[314joey]

This is all wrong on soooooooo many levels, anyone else would be rotting in jail right now, but this rag gets a free pass from our corrupt FBI and DOJ, what else could we have expected from this administration.

[2manymustangs]

This is all wrong on soooooooo many levels, anyone else would be rotting in jail right now, but this rag gets a free pass from our corrupt FBI and DOJ, what else could we have expected from this administration.

in 2009 Shrillery and her staff were documented requesting approval from NSA to use blackberry type personal devices and were denied repeatedly...

She did an ENDaround and now we know she was using MULTIPLE personal devices in addition to all of the personal server/domain/host...

^^^^^^ these points have not been mentioned... She and her staff knew it was not allowed/approved and did it anyway...

How does THAT and willfully destroying evidence not rise to a criminal offense???

[2manymustangs]

SO, more tidbits that I learned today were:

A) Comey/FBI didn't have HILLARY under oath when the interview was done, so no transcript/DETAILED record of the interview is available

B) Comey didn't talk to HILLARY himself, it was something like five different FBI agents that did the interview AND Comey didn't even review/interview all of them. He only talked to SOME of the folks that performed the interview...

[The Doctor]

The real problem . . .


63438

[The Doctor]

Strictly my opinion. You can believe what you want but I blame democrats/liberals for this crap.

63440

[The Doctor]

Anyone else smell the corruption?

63441

[rioracr]

you tube guy had a warrant but shrillery is not out of the woods yet, go Trey Gowdy and the rest that brought up some stuff yesterday that will reopen the case and Trey's report on Benghazi was spot on but the only thing that could not be found out was, who shut down the order that was given to help, that is one that might go to the grave but alot of people with blood on there hands. there was a poster that said they should put the families of Benghazi's lost in the front row of the debates..........great idea then she would have to really face them

[rioracr]

remember Bill Clinton got impeached for lieing about his Bj from Monica, we can only hope sHillery gets the same now that the case will be reopened thru the hearings with Congress..........

[2manymustangs]

Strictly my opinion. You can believe what you want but I blame democrats/liberals for this crap.

63440

Will OlameO have the balls to call this a racially motivated HATE CRIME? He and his admin absolutely OWNS this situation.......

"DALLAS — The sniper who fatally shot five Dallas cops and wounded seven more in the deadliest attack on a police force since 9/11 is an Army veteran who told officers he wanted to “kill white people.”

Micah X. Johnson, a 25-year-old who served six years in the Army Reserve, died early Friday when police deployed a robot to blow up an explosive device in the parking garage where the gunman was holed up.

“The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers,” Dallas Police Chief David Brown said at a news conference. “The suspect said he was upset about Black Lives Matter. He said he was upset about the recent police shootings.”"

[JohnnyRotten]

Will OlameO have the balls to call this a racially motivated HATE CRIME? He and his admin absolutely OWNS this situation.......

"DALLAS — The sniper who fatally shot five Dallas cops and wounded seven more in the deadliest attack on a police force since 9/11 is an Army veteran who told officers he wanted to “kill white people.”

Micah X. Johnson, a 25-year-old who served six years in the Army Reserve, died early Friday when police deployed a robot to blow up an explosive device in the parking garage where the gunman was holed up.

“The suspect said he was upset at white people. The suspect stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers,” Dallas Police Chief David Brown said at a news conference. “The suspect said he was upset about Black Lives Matter. He said he was upset about the recent police shootings.”"


He's in Poland sucking NATO's sausage.

These events are exactly what he wants and hopes will escalate.

Two words.....Martial Law.

I hope not, that's 'game over.'

[2manymustangs]

He's in Poland sucking NATO's sausage.

These events are exactly what he wants and hopes will escalate.

Two words.....Martial Law.

I hope not, that's 'game over.'

he is the tool of all tools....

[The Doctor]

Many, from the past were wiser than we gave them credit for . . .

63445

[The Doctor]

Is the "Black Lives Matters" group, that obama praised just one day before the Dallas police massacre really any different from the KKK, other than color?

[2manymustangs]

Many, from the past were wiser than we gave them credit for . . .

63445

^^^^ that is sooooooooooo funny and Ironic, I was thinking that very thing today, about liberal/progressive/commies... The downfall of our society...

[2manymustangs]

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT:

1) OBEY THE LAW
2) USE COMMON SENSE
3) STOP IMMEDIATELY
4) TURN THAT $#!T OFF
5) BE POLITE
6) SHUT THE F@@K UP
7) GET A WHITE FRIEND
8) ****DON'T RIDE WITH A MAD WOMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://youtu.be/igQDvYOt_iA

[spike morelli]

Those 8 rules should be observed by white people too! I mean, think about it, maybe white people aren't as paranoid of getting roughed up as black people, but it happens to white people too. Funny video though.

[2manymustangs]

Those 8 rules should be observed by white people too! I mean, think about it, maybe white people aren't as paranoid of getting roughed up as black people, but it happens to white people too. Funny video though.

I'm thinking that I was about 12 when I learned those basics... From my parents... LOTS of folks that are shot dead would be alive if they had just listened to ole mom & dad (assuming they had a dad around)...

I think the OBEY THE LAW part would go a long way in preventing lots of the shootings, no???

How about resisting arrest, if people would NOT resist and do exactly as the police instruct, I'm thinking that would go a long way in preventing shootings OR beat downs...

JUST THOSE TWO, set aside the other 6.....

What say ye??? :)

[314joey]

Those 8 rules should be observed by white people too! I mean, think about it, maybe white people aren't as paranoid of getting roughed up as black people, but it happens to white people too. Funny video though.

The few times in my life when I was confronted with a situation by the police I did "exactly" what they told me to do, I didn't fight them, I didn't wrestle with them, I didn't argue with them, then the next day I went and had a meeting with the chief of police about the officer I had the problem with, he got a reprimand and I didn't get shot, it really works great if you're not a stupid azz or a thug.

[2manymustangs]

The few times in my life when I was confronted with a situation by the police I did "exactly" what they told me to do, I didn't fight them, I didn't wrestle with them, I didn't argue with them, then the next day I went and had a meeting with the chief of police about the officer I had the problem with, he got a reprimand and I didn't get shot, it really works great if you're not a stupid azz or a thug.

FUnny how that works out so well, it's almost too simple... :D

[2manymustangs]

GOod riddens you nasty old liberal C$%T!!! GO AHEAD AND LEAVE, NOW... I will buy your one way ticket!!! Ignorante B!#CH!!!


In a wide-ranging interview with The New York Times, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg prodded the Senate to act on President Obama's Supreme Court nominee, discussed moving to New Zealand if Donald Trump is elected, and revealed the case she'd most like to see overturned.

I don't belive that with this ^^^^^ point of view she is FIT or DESERVERS or is QALIFIED to sit on ANY bench besides a park bench with the pigeons...

http://theweek.com/speedreads/635108/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-reveals-case-shed-most-like-overturned

[314joey]

That old liberal biddy should keep her "pie hole" shut, she can have her own opinion, but should keep it to herself, we all know she's a uber liberal and would rather piss on the constitution than protect it, she's the worst.

[riverrunner1984]

Fuck, looks like Pence is the VP pick for Trump.....
I really wanted Newt.....I think Newt would have been a much better choice.

[314joey]

I don't care who his VP is, I just don't want that lying crooked bitch Shillary in the White House, geez, how many more woman will Bill abuse again if he gets back in.

We donated to Trump last week and may throw him so more cash here again, Shillary is getting all that wall street money and running chitty ads against Trump.

Trump is far from perfect, but compared to her, he's a savior.

[riverrunner1984]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160715/4690a272e342524052b3ebbba55cbb5a.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2manymustangs]

I don't care who his VP is, I just don't want that lying crooked bitch Shillary in the White House, geez, how many more woman will Bill abuse again if he gets back in.

We donated to Trump last week and may throw him so more cash here again, Shillary is getting all that wall street money and running chitty ads against Trump.

Trump is far from perfect, but compared to her, he's a savior.

Republican party is playing the EMAILGATE game with Hillary just like they said that they would... Keep tightening the screws... SHe is squirmimg like a worm in hot ashes...

[riverrunner1984]

Republican party is playing the EMAILGATE game with Hillary just like they said that they would... Keep tightening the screws... SHe is squirmimg like a worm in hot ashes...

The polls were good for us yesterday....Like you said, we need to keep it up.

[2manymustangs]

The polls were good for us yesterday....Like you said, we need to keep it up.

Seems ALOT of the real FBI peeps are pizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzed at how things went down with Shrillary's EMAILGATE "investigation" by the DBAG...



"The real Hillary…. Her actual words:
1) “Where is the G@d damn flag? I want the G@d damn f@cking flag up every morning at f@cking sunrise”. Hillary to staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day 1991. From the book “Inside the White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 244
(2) “F@ck off! It’s enough I have to see you sh!t-kickers every day! I’m not going to talk to you, too! Just do your G@ddamn job and keep your mouth shut.” Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with “Good Morning.” From the book “America Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p.90
(3) “If you want to remain on this detail, get your f@cking @ss over here and grab those bags!” Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident. From the book “The First Partner” p. 25
(4) “Stay the f@ck back, stay the f@ck back away from me! Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else! Just f@cking do as I say, Okay!!?” Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail. From the book “Unlimited Access” by Clinton ‘s FBI Agent-in-Charge, Gary Aldridge, p.139
(5) “Where’s the miserable c@ck sucker?” (otherwise known as “Bill Clinton”) Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer. From the book “The Truth about Hillary” by Edward Klein, p. 5
(6) “You f@cking idiot” Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event. From the book “Crossfire” ~pg. 84
(7) “Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those f@cking sunglasses! We need to go back!” Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while in route to Air Force One. From the book ” Dereliction of Duty” p. 71-72
(8) “Come on Bill, put your d!ck up! You can’t f@ck her here!!” Hillary to Gov. Bill Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female. From the book “Inside the White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 243
There it is ……..book, chapter and page…….the real Hillary Rotten Clinton!
Additionally, when she walked around the White House, NO ONE was permitted to look her in the eye, they all had to lower their heads with their eyes towards the ground whenever she walked by. Clearly she is a class act!
This ill-tempered, violent, loud-mouth, hateful and abusive woman wants to be your next President, and have total control as Commander-in-Chief of our Military, the very Military for which she has shown incredible disdain throughout her public life .
Remember her most vile comment about Benghazi: “What difference at this point does it make?”
Now it will be clear why the crew of “Marine One” helicopter nick-named the craft, “Broomstick ONE ” – courtesy of Christina Plantz
The scum of the earth at her finest"

Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/#ixzz4EUeAqttq

[riverrunner1984]

Seems ALOT of the real FBI peeps are pizzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzed at how things went down with Shrillary's EMAILGATE "investigation" by the DBAG...



"The real Hillary…. Her actual words:
1) “Where is the G@d damn flag? I want the G@d damn f@cking flag up every morning at f@cking sunrise”. Hillary to staff at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day 1991. From the book “Inside the White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 244
(2) “F@ck off! It’s enough I have to see you sh!t-kickers every day! I’m not going to talk to you, too! Just do your G@ddamn job and keep your mouth shut.” Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with “Good Morning.” From the book “America Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p.90
(3) “If you want to remain on this detail, get your f@cking @ss over here and grab those bags!” Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident. From the book “The First Partner” p. 25
(4) “Stay the f@ck back, stay the f@ck back away from me! Don’t come within ten yards of me, or else! Just f@cking do as I say, Okay!!?” Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail. From the book “Unlimited Access” by Clinton ‘s FBI Agent-in-Charge, Gary Aldridge, p.139
(5) “Where’s the miserable c@ck sucker?” (otherwise known as “Bill Clinton”) Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer. From the book “The Truth about Hillary” by Edward Klein, p. 5
(6) “You f@cking idiot” Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event. From the book “Crossfire” ~pg. 84
(7) “Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those f@cking sunglasses! We need to go back!” Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while in route to Air Force One. From the book ” Dereliction of Duty” p. 71-72
(8) “Come on Bill, put your d!ck up! You can’t f@ck her here!!” Hillary to Gov. Bill Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female. From the book “Inside the White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 243
There it is ……..book, chapter and page…….the real Hillary Rotten Clinton!
Additionally, when she walked around the White House, NO ONE was permitted to look her in the eye, they all had to lower their heads with their eyes towards the ground whenever she walked by. Clearly she is a class act!
This ill-tempered, violent, loud-mouth, hateful and abusive woman wants to be your next President, and have total control as Commander-in-Chief of our Military, the very Military for which she has shown incredible disdain throughout her public life .
Remember her most vile comment about Benghazi: “What difference at this point does it make?”
Now it will be clear why the crew of “Marine One” helicopter nick-named the craft, “Broomstick ONE ” – courtesy of Christina Plantz
The scum of the earth at her finest"

Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/the-fbi-just-gave-hillary-the-worst-news-of-her-campaign/#ixzz4EUeAqttq

Did you hear they had to sign confidentially agreements before even interviewing her.
Then on top of that, the interview was not recorded or taped......Seriously something is way off there....

[2manymustangs]

Did you hear they had to sign confidentially agreements before even interviewing her.
Then on top of that, the interview was not recorded or taped......Seriously something is way off there....

Yep.... COmeyHomey really is playing all the moves.... He made himself the grand jury, special prosecutor.... There is some serious legal wrangling going on in that camp...


I wanna know what happened to the rigging situation with Wasserman Schults, they sure have made that go away quickly....

[2manymustangs]

FUll letter here:

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/25191


November 16, 2011 RELEASE IN FULL President Barack Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 Dear Mr. President, We write you today as local government leaders who are gravely concerned that expansion of tar sands oil imports will increase our dependence on this high carbon fuel for decades to come. Expansion of high carbon fuels such as tar sands undermine hard work by local communities everywhere to fight climate change, reduce dependence on oil, and create a clean energy future. We ask that you do not grant a presidential permit for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline that would bring high carbon tar sands from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast. Mayors from across the country wrote to Secretary of State Clinton about this pipeline project in March, 2011, asking her to address the many gaps that the Environmental Protection Agency identified in the environmental impact statement, and evaluate the project's impact on local community efforts to fight climate change and build clean energy economies. Unfortunately, however, the Final Environmental Impact Statement remains inadequate and does not address local community concerns. This pipeline project not only undermines local community efforts to reduce oil use and fight climate change, it creates risks to critical American waters such as the Ogallala aquifer and over 1,000 rivers. Pipeline leaks are an immediate concern: the first Keystone pipeline has already experienced 30 leaks in the United States and Canada in its first year.

[riverrunner1984]

Pence is sounding pretty damn good! Looks like he has a great record in Indiana!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[314joey]

Republican party is playing the EMAILGATE game with Hillary just like they said that they would... Keep tightening the screws... SHe is squirmimg like a worm in hot ashes...

Nixon erases 18 minutes off a tape recording and has to leave office, this rag erases 30K e-mails and gets to run for the DNC for the highest office in the country, just shameful.

[shueman]

WTF is going on in our country ...

63550

[314joey]

WTF is going on in our country ...

63550

It's become the workers and freebies, either you're part of the solution or the problem.

Not you specifically, all of us.

[314joey]

I'm glad Michelle is championing childhood obesity.

[314joey]

Bernie is pissed, they stole the primary from him, we could have had more "free" stuff.

[riverrunner1984]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160726/d7503b3e1af2a4efd836db5455fe457b.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[314joey]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160726/d7503b3e1af2a4efd836db5455fe457b.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I love this !!!!!!!!!!!!

[The Doctor]

Silly democrats

63754

[shueman]

:D
http://www.performanceboats.com/gallery/data/961/BBuW10E.gif

[The Doctor]

So shue, who you voting for and why.
In fairness, I'll go first:
I'm voting for Trump because he wants less corruption in government not more as Killary would surely bring.
Also, because he wants America strong, great, safe and secure again rather than Killary who wants us to fail so a one-world Soros-run government could be established.
Also, because he's smart enough to choose a running mate without Muslim ties and corruption in his past as Killary's running mate.
Also, because he understands how business works - he's actually produced products, services and jobs his entire life as opposed to Killary who has failed at everything she's done in her life.
Also, because he wants American business to return rather than head off-shore.
Also, because he wants to stop illegal immigration where Killary wants to immediately bring hundreds of thousands more illegal immigrants to America in her first year for our taxpayer dollars to support.
Also, because he wants a strong military rather than a UN peacekeeping core.
Also, because he wants to reduce our behemoth government rather than grow it exponentially.
Also, because he wants to increase American energy production, rather than kill it like Killary wants.
Also, because he will negotiate appropriate trade agreements that are fair for America rather than ones that are best for Killary's foreign donors.
Also, because he loves this nation more than himself and he wants to see it great again.

Now, shue, it's your turn and remember, to be honest - none of that "I'm leaning towards Trump for now" crap. :D

[2manymustangs]

Will Hillary get BOOOOd when she takes the stage and opens her yapper???


( ) yes
( ) no

Check one...

[2manymustangs]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160726/d7503b3e1af2a4efd836db5455fe457b.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is soooooooo funny!!! The Shining is a movie that my son and I have watched sooooooooooo many times... I'm cracking up at this...

[CarolynandBob]

Heard it yesterday on facebook.

Kaine and Unable

[2manymustangs]

Heard it yesterday on facebook.

Kaine and Unable (to be honest and truthful)

fixed it ;) ^^^

[314joey]

Will Hillary get BOOOOd when she takes the stage and opens her yapper???


( ) yes
( ) no

Check one...

I doubt it, too many kool-aid drinking.

[314joey]

I wonder who Monica is going to vote for.

[The Doctor]

'ol shue sure went quiet! :D

[2manymustangs]

'ol shue sure went quiet! :D

awwwwwwwwww :( we LIKE Eliminators!!! we just dont like the policies of DEMOncrats...

[2manymustangs]

Will even THIS stop the koolAID drinkers??? doubtfull...

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/289541-wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails (http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/289541-wikileaks-releases-hacked-dnc-voicemails)

[riverrunner1984]

Got my new trucker hat in!!!http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160729/c642f4c3530891aac22e3d28472743b7.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[spike morelli]

What amazes me, is that polls show a pretty even split of Clinton/Trump supporters. My God, it's as if the Clinton supporters have NO idea how badly our country has been screwed by incumbent politicians. Both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party have been useless in steering our great nation in recent years. You seriously mean to tell me that for the last 8 years, out of all the people in politics, Clinton is the ONLY choice the Democrats can come up with? Yeah, there's Bernie, but the Dems screwed him. The Republicans were just as lame, having a dozen entries that were ALL overshadowed by an independent outsider, Donald Trump. I say, let's oust every single one of the worthless Washington money-suckers and give a FRESH voice a chance. Being that Trump isn't a politician, is beyond blame for the shit this country is in, and isn't afraid to speak his mind ( even if he says something politically "incorrect"), I feel he's the better choice. Hell, even though I'm not a big "Bernie" supporter, I'd vote for him any day over Bill's wife. Hilary says she's "pro-women", if she was really a stand-up woman, she would have told Bill to pack his bags after Monica sucked his wanker and the whole world knew, BUT NO, she made like it didn't happen for the "party's" sake. That's when I knew for sure, she was an idiot. Nobody is better off today for the last 8 years of Obama, so why take any more? Obama's campaign slogan was "Change". You really want something to change, and with promise for a better change, common logic will tell you that you must vote the current administration's thinking out. That means not supporting Clinton....the only change is voting Trump in to office. I'm not voting strictly Republican OR Democrat , I'm voting my gut for the good of America, and the American people.

[2manymustangs]

What amazes me, is that polls show a pretty even split of Clinton/Trump supporters. My God, it's as if the Clinton supporters have NO idea how badly our country has been screwed by incumbent politicians. Both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party have been useless in steering our great nation in recent years. You seriously mean to tell me that for the last 8 years, out of all the people in politics, Clinton is the ONLY choice the Democrats can come up with? Yeah, there's Bernie, but the Dems screwed him. The Republicans were just as lame, having a dozen entries that were ALL overshadowed by an independent outsider, Donald Trump. I say, let's oust every single one of the worthless Washington money-suckers and give a FRESH voice a chance. Being that Trump isn't a politician, is beyond blame for the shit this country is in, and isn't afraid to speak his mind ( even if he says something politically "incorrect"), I feel he's the better choice. Hell, even though I'm not a big "Bernie" supporter, I'd vote for him any day over Bill's wife. Hilary says she's "pro-women", if she was really a stand-up woman, she would have told Bill to pack his bags after Monica sucked his wanker and the whole world knew, BUT NO, she made like it didn't happen for the "party's" sake. That's when I knew for sure, she was an idiot. Nobody is better off today for the last 8 years of Obama, so why take any more? Obama's campaign slogan was "Change". You really want something to change, and with promise for a better change, common logic will tell you that you must vote the current administration's thinking out. That means not supporting Clinton....the only change is voting Trump in to office. I'm not voting strictly Republican OR Democrat , I'm voting my gut for the good of America, and the American people.

Im convinced that the people have spoken and that is exactly what is fueling the BERNIE movement as well as the DONALD movement... The establishment is done... And the establishment is going to fight it tooth and nail...

[314joey]

Love the HAT

[riverrunner1984]

What amazes me, is that polls show a pretty even split of Clinton/Trump supporters. My God, it's as if the Clinton supporters have NO idea how badly our country has been screwed by incumbent politicians. Both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party have been useless in steering our great nation in recent years. You seriously mean to tell me that for the last 8 years, out of all the people in politics, Clinton is the ONLY choice the Democrats can come up with? Yeah, there's Bernie, but the Dems screwed him. The Republicans were just as lame, having a dozen entries that were ALL overshadowed by an independent outsider, Donald Trump. I say, let's oust every single one of the worthless Washington money-suckers and give a FRESH voice a chance. Being that Trump isn't a politician, is beyond blame for the shit this country is in, and isn't afraid to speak his mind ( even if he says something politically "incorrect"), I feel he's the better choice. Hell, even though I'm not a big "Bernie" supporter, I'd vote for him any day over Bill's wife. Hilary says she's "pro-women", if she was really a stand-up woman, she would have told Bill to pack his bags after Monica sucked his wanker and the whole world knew, BUT NO, she made like it didn't happen for the "party's" sake. That's when I knew for sure, she was an idiot. Nobody is better off today for the last 8 years of Obama, so why take any more? Obama's campaign slogan was "Change". You really want something to change, and with promise for a better change, common logic will tell you that you must vote the current administration's thinking out. That means not supporting Clinton....the only change is voting Trump in to office. I'm not voting strictly Republican OR Democrat , I'm voting my gut for the good of America, and the American people.


Im convinced that the people have spoken and that is exactly what is fueling the BERNIE movement as well as the DONALD movement... The establishment is done... And the establishment is going to fight it tooth and nail...

Bingo!!! We want and need an outside. Time to clean house! I really believe this is just the beginning


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[spike morelli]

Remember this? Go ahead women , vote for Clinton, your feminine "champion" who won't even stand up for herself....so just how is she going to stand up for YOU?63769

[314joey]

She's for women's equality, just ask these ladies.

[spike morelli]

You know what, I really think Trump is the better choice, but I just gotta say....Donald! Take your finger off the F****** Tweet button! Geezee, we need a "Handler" to go through your comments prior to posting! The Dems are baiting you, and you keep replying. STFU! Be smart, this is political war brother.

[314joey]

You know what, I really think Trump is the better choice, but I just gotta say....Donald! Take your finger off the F****** Tweet button! Geezee, we need a "Handler" to go through your comments prior to posting! The Dems are baiting you, and you keep replying. STFU! Be smart, this is political war brother.

I agree, sometimes he needs "duct tape" his mouth and break his finger, he's his own worst enemy, if he just closes his Pie hole and just lets Shillary talk, everyone will see she's corrupt and a big liar.

[riverrunner1984]

Damn these chicks are smart and HOT!
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160802/02f65404966215fcb6bbe3cc1bd34c5c.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HB Vic]

It needs a Hotboat sticker [emoji41]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2manymustangs]

It needs a Hotboat sticker [emoji41]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

four stickers... one for each butt cheek...

if I pay for the printing can we get some HOTBOAT pasties made? they could also double as butt cheek stickers... :partyguy:

[314joey]

I want to be the installer of the stickers on those nice rumps.

[cdnoutlaw]

I want to be the installer of the stickers on those nice rumps.

You better butt out!!
Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2manymustangs]

https://youtu.be/iEe_eraFWWs

[riverrunner1984]

Got another smart hot one here!!!
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160803/56466dccaf22e3702aebe94a3c9a64dc.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[The Doctor]

Voter ID necessary, you ask?

63777

[2manymustangs]

Voter ID necessary, you ask?

63777

Sounds like Mexico or some other 3rd world country Doc... :action-smiley-047:

Maybe a purple dye on our thumbs as we vote like India or Iraq would fix the problem... ;)

[314joey]

But look what all she's done, oh,...................................... I forgot about Bengazi. :dogrun:

[2manymustangs]

Im thinking of a plan to dispose of Treasonous politicians, crooks, people that are a national security risk, Overcrowded prisons/hardened criminals/repeat offenders...

It involves multiple sections of worn out train tracks, metal rings welded to the tracks and a few C130s doing short loops about 15 miles out over the ocean...

63779

63780

[spectra3279]

Got another smart hot one here!!!
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160803/56466dccaf22e3702aebe94a3c9a64dc.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd rather vote for this

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

[2manymustangs]

http://megynkelly.org/95728/bill-clinton-got-millions-from-worlds-biggest-sharia-law-education-firm/



surprised??? Im not... :bangmyhead:

[2manymustangs]

The DNC OR the poor hacker that had to read their drivel :angry-smiley-018:


"Hillary Campaign Victim Of THIRD Hack"

63783

“A CLINTON CAMPAIGN SPOKESMAN SAID IN A STATEMENT LATE ON FRIDAY THAT AN ANALYTICS DATA PROGRAM MAINTAINED BY THE DNC AND USED BY THE CAMPAIGN AND A NUMBER OF OTHER ENTITIES ‘WAS ACCESSED AS PART OF THE DNC HACK.’

“‘OUR CAMPAIGN COMPUTER SYSTEM HAS BEEN UNDER REVIEW BY OUTSIDE CYBER SECURITY EXPERTS. TO DATE, THEY HAVE FOUND NO EVIDENCE THAT OUR INTERNAL SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED,’ SAID CLINTON CAMPAIGN SPOKESMAN NICK MERRILL.

“LATER, A CAMPAIGN OFFICIAL SAID HACKERS HAD ACCESS TO THE ANALYTICS PROGRAM’S SERVER FOR APPROXIMATELY FIVE DAYS. THE ANALYTICS DATA PROGRAM IS ONE OF MANY SYSTEMS THE CAMPAIGN ACCESSES TO CONDUCT VOTER ANALYSIS, AND DOES NOT INCLUDE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS OR CREDIT CARD NUMBERS, THE OFFICIAL SAID.”

[314joey]

Why would anyone vote for her.

[2manymustangs]

Why would anyone vote for her.

aaaaaaahahahahahahaha :)

[The Doctor]

Sheep will buy anything . . .

63882

[314joey]

Dahm that's funny.

[314joey]

Here's one of Hillary's accomplishments when she was an attorney.

[2manymustangs]

here we go again.........

63885


So, to summarize, courtesy of Janet Tavakoli, the Clinton related body count so far this election cycle: Five in just under six weeks - four convenient deaths plus one suicide...

1) Shawn Lucas, Sanders supporter who served papers to DNC on the Fraud Case (DOD August 2, 2016)

2) Victor Thorn, Clinton author (and Holocaust denier, probably the least credible on this list) shot himself in an apparent suicide. Conspiracy theorists at Mystery Writers of America said some guys will do anything to sell books. (DOD August, 2016)

3) Seth Conrad Rich, Democratic staffer, aged 27, apparently on his way to speak to the FBI about a case possibly involving the Clintons. The D.C. murder was not a robbery. (DOD July 8, 2016)

4) John Ashe, UN official who allegedly crushed his own throat while lifting weights, because he watched too many James Bond films and wanted to try the move where the bad guy tries to…oh, never mind. “He was scheduled to testify against the Clintons and the Democrat Party.” (DOD June 22, 2016)

5) Mike Flynn, the Big Government Editor for Breitbart News. Mike Flynn’s final article was published the day he died, “Clinton Cash: Bill, Hillary Created Their Own Chinese Foundation in 2014.” (DOD June 23, 2016)
It must be coincidence, right?

[314joey]

Here's our Gal.

[The Doctor]

The Clinton death toll continues to climb . . .

64064

64065

[314joey]

Hillary's resume.

[The Doctor]

Open the link and vote for your choice but try not to be too surprised at the results of this poll - especially since ABC put it up. I doubt they will leave it up very long.

http://abcnewsgo.co/2016/08/abc-live-poll-who-are-you-voting-for/

[HB Vic]

I don't normally share too much in regard to my political views (for obvious reasons), but man, I just cannot stand Hillary.

And shouldn't there be a rule against the spouse of a former President running for POTUS office? Just seems like a conflict of interest, he was already President, IF she wins, he'll have influence again. Just seems sooooo wrong to me.

[314joey]

If she wins King and Queen Clinton will create a new department in the US gubmnet.................it's called the Clinton Global Foundation, no one seems to care that theyboth lined their pockets when she was Sec of State, who knows what they'll steal this time...................Trump is a goof and I'm not a fan, but those two are corrupt it disgusts me.

[314joey]

It's about friggin' time.

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/joint-fbi-us-attorney-probe-of-clinton-foundation-is-underway/ar-BBvwVw5?li=BBnb7Kz

[The Doctor]

Fact

64082

[The Doctor]

I'm crazy enough to believe that even the liberal skull can be penetrated. Maybe I'm wrong???

64083

[The Doctor]

Am I the only one bothered by this person?

64084

[314joey]

I'd want him supporting me,

[riverrunner1984]

I'm a supporter but this is damn funny lol
http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160816/6ef8496cac70e7c294082d754a2c576c.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[rschap1]

:)
:)
:)

[2manymustangs]

Lets say that somehow in the next two months HITLERY gets both of her saggy flabby titties in the wringer and gets felony charges by DOJ/FBI...

THen who does the DEMONCRatic party put in the race??? AND can they bring someone to the table that will give Trump a run for his money???

[314joey]

Lets say that somehow in the next two months HITLERY gets both of her saggy flabby titties in the wringer and gets felony charges by DOJ/FBI...

THen who does the DEMONCRatic party put in the race??? AND can they bring someone to the table that will give Trump a run for his money???


Probably Crazy Joe

[314joey]

Someone explain this to me, here's the Mayors for some of the biggest urban cities who have the highest unemployment, highest crime rate, lowest education numbers, these cites are crumbling before our eyes, but who do the people keep voting for, the same thing.

The definition of insanity "keep doing the same thing over and over and keep expecting a different outcome".

Yes, the blue is democratic Mayor and red is for republican, scary isn't it, of course the number is how many terms (4 years) the respective parties have had.

[The Doctor]

Choose wisely, my friends. You can't have it both ways.

64098

[The Doctor]

Dare to compare . . .

64099

[spike morelli]

I saw on the Internet this last week where someone had made a half dozen fibreglass statues of Donald Trump, purposely sculpted naked and with expressly exaggerated humiliating features, and set out in various states in the public. Wow. I could not dream up a better way to express how the "pro Hilary" idiots have lost all sense of decency and of what's right and wrong in this world, than that display. Imagine the complete horror and lambasting that would occur of the Trump supporters if someone did the same with Hilary, sculpted all sagging tits with a cellulite ass, naked, on the street!
Wrong is Wrong people. The Liberal media should NEVER have run those pictures....and don't show them here either. I'd hate to think that our society today accepts this rude, un-acceptable behavior. Maybe it's a small sign of how far the left will really go, or how far corrupt politicians have warped those people's minds. Donald Trump's organization is trying to HELP America, and give the power back to Americans. ( Of the People, For the People, By the People, as the Constitution says ). The Obama/Clinton supporters are like Alcoholics who don't even realize they have a problem running, and ruining their lives, and they refuse help from those who only want to help them and give them their lives back.
I am open to those outside of my own values, but I don't suffer fools easily.

[The Doctor]

I saw on the Internet this last week where someone had made a half dozen fibreglass statues of Donald Trump, purposely sculpted naked and with expressly exaggerated humiliating features, and set out in various states in the public. Wow. I could not dream up a better way to express how the "pro Hilary" idiots have lost all sense of decency and of what's right and wrong in this world, than that display. Imagine the complete horror and lambasting that would occur of the Trump supporters if someone did the same with Hilary, sculpted all sagging tits with a cellulite ass, naked, on the street!
Wrong is Wrong people. The Liberal media should NEVER have run those pictures....and don't show them here either. I'd hate to think that our society today accepts this rude, un-acceptable behavior. Maybe it's a small sign of how far the left will really go, or how far corrupt politicians have warped those people's minds. Donald Trump's organization is trying to HELP America, and give the power back to Americans. ( Of the People, For the People, By the People, as the Constitution says ). The Obama/Clinton supporters are like Alcoholics who don't even realize they have a problem running, and ruining their lives, and they refuse help from those who only want to help them and give them their lives back.
I am open to those outside of my own values, but I don't suffer fools easily.

Spike, your dead right about these clowns.
First of all, they require double standards - one set of values for them and another for the right to be held to
Then they are protected by the media so any lengths they go to will still receive favorable treatment while the right is carefully scrutinized.
Lastly, this administration has yet to go after a single perpetrator from within their ranks. Not for Fast and Furious, not for the lies and deception used to pass obamacare, not for election fraud in the DNC, not for Lois Lerner who was proven to be corrupt as were many within the IRS, NSA, FBI, EPA, DOJ, Secretary of State or the president himself. There is clear evidence to convict them all but they take no action, believing they are above the law. They simply will not allow charges to be brought forth on their own.
They are more corrupt than the mob or drug lords and they have been caught red handed without consequence.

[spike morelli]

While I'm on this soapbox, there's another thing that concerns me. Anyone out there see this last week, the $400 MILLION dollars in CASH, delivered to Iran for the release of some hostages? While most point their fingers at Obama and his dishonest diatribe, ( which IS dishonest ), I can't help but think that Obama didn't just ask for the keys to a bank and do this all himself. No, a goddamn whole lot of politicians in Washington were in on this, Democrat and Republicans. Just WHOSE money did they give away??? The American Taxpayers, that's who! The American people didn't O.K. this, nobody asked the American people whether or not this is what we want our elected officials to do. The reality is that a great many besides Obama knew about this happening. How far does our crooked government extend. We need to get rid of more of Washington than we know.

[2manymustangs]

I saw on the Internet this last week where someone had made a half dozen fibreglass statues of Donald Trump, purposely sculpted naked and with expressly exaggerated humiliating features, and set out in various states in the public. Wow. I could not dream up a better way to express how the "pro Hilary" idiots have lost all sense of decency and of what's right and wrong in this world, than that display. Imagine the complete horror and lambasting that would occur of the Trump supporters if someone did the same with Hilary, sculpted all sagging tits with a cellulite ass, naked, on the street!
Wrong is Wrong people. The Liberal media should NEVER have run those pictures....and don't show them here either. I'd hate to think that our society today accepts this rude, un-acceptable behavior. Maybe it's a small sign of how far the left will really go, or how far corrupt politicians have warped those people's minds. Donald Trump's organization is trying to HELP America, and give the power back to Americans. ( Of the People, For the People, By the People, as the Constitution says ). The Obama/Clinton supporters are like Alcoholics who don't even realize they have a problem running, and ruining their lives, and they refuse help from those who only want to help them and give them their lives back.
I am open to those outside of my own values, but I don't suffer fools easily.


While I'm on this soapbox, there's another thing that concerns me. Anyone out there see this last week, the $400 MILLION dollars in CASH, delivered to Iran for the release of some hostages? While most point their fingers at Obama and his dishonest diatribe, ( which IS dishonest ), I can't help but think that Obama didn't just ask for the keys to a bank and do this all himself. No, a goddamn whole lot of politicians in Washington were in on this, Democrat and Republicans. Just WHOSE money did they give away??? The American Taxpayers, that's who! The American people didn't O.K. this, nobody asked the American people whether or not this is what we want our elected officials to do. The reality is that a great many besides Obama knew about this happening. How far does our crooked government extend. We need to get rid of more of Washington than we know.

AMEN brother... KEEP GOING!!!


I had a flashback Spikey... Hope you likey...

https://youtu.be/V8lT1o0sDwI

[HB Vic]

Someone posted this on social media Hillary Clinton goes to a gifted-student primary school in New York to talk about the world. After her talk she offers question
time.

One little boy puts up his hand. Hillary asks him what his name
is.
"Kenneth," he say
"And what is your question, Kenneth?" she
asks.

"I have three questions," he says.
"1st -- whatever happened in
Benghazi?"
"2nd -- why would you run for president if you are not capable
of
handling two e-mail accounts?
"And, 3rd -- whatever happened to the
missing six-billion-dollars
while you were Secretary of State?"

Just
then the bell rings for recess. Hillary informs the kiddies that
they will
continue after recess.

When they resume Hillary says, "Okay, where were
we? Oh, that's right,
question time. Who has a question?

A different
boy -- little Johnny -- puts his hand up.

Hillary points to him and asks
him what his name is. "Johnny," he says.

"And what is your question,
Johnny?" she asks.

"I have five questions," he says.
"1st -- whatever
happened in Benghazi?
"2nd -- why would you run for president if you are not
capable of
handling two e-mail accounts?
"3rd -- whatever happened to the
missing six-billion dollars while you
were Secretary of State?
"4th -- why
did the recess bell go off 20 minutes early?"
"
And 5th -- where's
Kenneth?"


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2manymustangs]

A teacher was teaching her second grade class about the government, so for homework that one day, she told her her students to ask their parents what the government is.

When Little Johnny got home that day, he went up to his dad and ask his what the government was.
His dad thought for a while and answered, ''Look at it this way: I'm the president, your mom is Congress, your maid is the work force, you are the people and your baby brother is the future.''

''I still don't get it'' responded the Little Johnny.

''Why don't you sleep on it then? Maybe you'll understand it better,'' said the dad.

''Okay then...good night'' said Little Jonny went off to bed. In the middle of the night, Little Johnny was awakened by his baby brother's crying. He went to his baby brother's crib and found that his baby brother had taken a crap in his diaper. So Little Johnny went to his parent's room to get help. When he got to his parent's bedroom, he looked through the keyhole to check if his parents were asleep. Through the keyhole he saw his mom loudly snoring, but his dad wasn't there.

So he went to the maid's room. When he looked through the maid's room keyhole, he saw his dad having sex with his maid. Little Johnny was surprised, but then he just realized something and thinks aloud,

''OH!! Now I understand the government! The President is screwing the work force, Congress is fast asleep, nobody cares about the people, and the future is full of s**t!''

[314joey]

Colin Powell better get some secret service protection, he's on someone's "short list"

[314joey]

Poor Lochte, maybe he should run for President.

[The Doctor]

Witnesses have a free ride.

64119

[The Doctor]

Come on boys, you know who you are. Step up to the plate.

64120

[314joey]

She quit being the Secretary of State.

[2manymustangs]

Witnesses have a free ride.

64119

Aahhhhhhhhhhhhahahahahahaha :D

[314joey]

This stuff is unbelievable and people will still vote for her.


http://www.dailywire.com/news/8601/wow-over-half-hillarys-meetings-state-department-ben-shapiro

[314joey]

Who needs a DL.

[2manymustangs]

Get out the popcorn and grab a seat folks...

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/breaking-benghazi-docs-found-deleted-hillary-clinton-email-files-state-dept/ (http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/breaking-benghazi-docs-found-deleted-hillary-clinton-email-files-state-dept/)

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/court-orders-new-clinton-email-production-september-13/ (http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/court-orders-new-clinton-email-production-september-13/)

In a court filing this week, the State Department admitted it had found Benghazi-related documents among the 14,900 Clinton emails and attachments uncovered by the FBI that Mrs. Clinton deleted and withheld from the State Department.

The first batch of new emails comes in response to a court order issued today in a November 13, 2015, Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed against the Department of State seeking all communications between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House from the day of the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi and throughout the following week. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Dr. Larry Kawa of Boca Raton, Florida, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division (Larry Kawa v. U.S. Department of State (No. 9:15-cv-81560)). Today’s order requiring the production of the emails from the 14,900 new Clinton emails as well as any other communications or emails from the other materials recently delivered to the State Department by the FBI was issued by U.S. District Court Judge William P. Dimitrouleas. The court ruled:

The State Department shall search the material, determine whether any responsive records exist, and complete its first production of non-exempt records, to the extent any exist, by September 13, 2016.

In a separate case, Judicial Watch has been seeking Clinton’s communications about the attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, during which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith were killed. A second assault targeted a nearby compound, killing two government contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00692)).

After admitting in an August 23 court filing that it found documents that “satisfied the [Benghazi related] search terms” of the new Clinton emails, the State Department proposed a rolling production schedule, “under which State would make its first production of any non-exempt responsive records subject to FOIA on September 30, 2016, and complete production no later than October 31, 2016.” Judicial Watch then asked the court that State make known the volume of documents remaining to be reviewed before it accepts whether the production schedule is reasonable. Today, U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta informed the attorneys the Court wants to schedule a hearing on this issue for Tuesday, August 30.

[314joey]

The sad thing is she clearly broke the law and Obummer and his DOJ will never do anything about it, our country is going down the chitter.

[2manymustangs]

The sad thing is she clearly broke the law and Obummer and his DOJ will never do anything about it, our country is going down the chitter.

Addition ^^^ Open up a Canadian branch of said "charity" and try to BUFFALO people into believing that Canadian law prohibits disclosure of donor IDs (which it doesn't as per the legal analysts...................

Place a scapegoat in charge of said Canadian branch of said "charity" and VIRTUALLY hold him hostage when he is hauled in for questioning...............

[2manymustangs]

http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/13-of-abedin-emails-100-redacted/ (http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/13-of-abedin-emails-100-redacted/)

SO, was there only 3 or 4 emails in the GREY area of "classified" with a tiny little obscure "C" on them???

"Fox News commented that the fact that portions of the FBI investigative file are heavily redacted and must be held and read by lawmakers in a secure facility on Capitol Hill shows how classified the material remains, despite claims made by the Clinton campaign.

“The campaign’s call to release the FBI agents’ notes appears suspect because the material is too highly classified to make public,” Fox News reported. “The FBI told the committee that the documents cannot be released in part or in full without prior agency approval.”

Appearing on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” show Aug. 22, Chaffetz again complained about the high level of redactions in the released FBI documents.

“Hillary Clinton is out there saying there’s not very much sensitive information in there, that she didn’t trade in sensitive classified information. It’s so sensitive and so classified that even I as the chairman of the Oversight Committee don’t have the high level of clearance to see what’s in those materials,” Chaffetz said."

[cdnoutlaw]

Addition ^^^ Open up a Canadian branch of said "charity" and try to BUFFALO people into believing that Canadian law prohibits disclosure of donor IDs (which it doesn't as per the legal analysts...................

Place a scapegoat in charge of said Canadian branch of said "charity" and VIRTUALLY hold him hostage when he is hauled in for questioning...............

Please keep us as Canadians out of your politics , we (as the best neighbours you guys could have) will except whoever you guys vote for. Imagine having a hostile or unfriendly country on your border


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[314joey]

Please keep us as Canadians out of your politics , we (as the best neighbours you guys could have) will except whoever you guys vote for. Imagine having a hostile or unfriendly country on your border


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm cool with that, but could you take that no-talent Bieber back, he's yours and he's such a turd, we don't want him anymore......................lmao

[The Doctor]

So this is the picture of being oppressed by white people. You are adopted by loving white parents and raised with love.
Sure sheds lots of light on him.

64134

[2manymustangs]

Please keep us as Canadians out of your politics , we (as the best neighbours you guys could have) will except whoever you guys vote for. Imagine having a hostile or unfriendly country on your border


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

:) do you mean like MEXICO???

I don't have to imagine having a hostile/unfriendly country on our border...

Look what the Mexico (federal and local) govt has given us in exchange for all of the wealth/jobs we have given that nation...

[314joey]

So this is the picture of being oppressed by white people. You are adopted by loving white parents and raised with love.
Sure sheds lots of light on him.]


This guy is a disgrace, they should make his azz sit on the bench during the game, if I was a ticket holder I would give them up until he acted right, what a jerk-off.

[2manymustangs]

This guy is a disgrace, they should make his azz sit on the bench during the game, if I was a ticket holder I would give them up until he acted right, what a jerk-off.

You will be waiting a long time.................

[314joey]

Looks like the 49ers may make him sit, I hope so, he's chitty QB anyway.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/colin-kaepernick-could-be-cut-before-the-season-begins-for-%e2%80%9cfootball-reasons%e2%80%9d/ar-AAicYdy?li=BBnb7Kz

[2manymustangs]

Looks like the 49ers may make him sit, I hope so, he's chitty QB anyway.


http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/colin-kaepernick-could-be-cut-before-the-season-begins-for-%e2%80%9cfootball-reasons%e2%80%9d/ar-AAicYdy?li=BBnb7Kz


The FRISCO 49ers??? :stir: Just remembering how much GRADS liked it when we would say FRISCO instead of SanFran or ....................... :D

[314joey]

That loser probably sits during the anthem too.

[2manymustangs]

That loser probably sits during the anthem too.

:rant:

[2manymustangs]

http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/29/exclusive-hillarys-closest-aides-call-her-email-policy-outrageous-unbelievable/ (http://dailycaller.com/2016/08/29/exclusive-hillarys-closest-aides-call-her-email-policy-outrageous-unbelievable/)

Three months into her term as secretary of state, two of Hillary Clinton’s top aides bluntly called her indiscriminate release of her private email address “outrageous” and “unbelievable,” according to an April 2009 email chain obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The email indicates that very early into her term as the country’s top diplomat, Clinton’s two closest aides were scandalized by their boss’ indifference towards email security. “This is so unbelievable, she should not be giving her email to everyone,” said a frustrated Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills in an April 3, 2009, email exchange with Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin. “Don’t get me started,” stated Abedin. “Personally, I think it’s outrageous.”

Three months into her term as secretary of state, two of Hillary Clinton’s top aides bluntly called her indiscriminate release of her private email address “outrageous” and “unbelievable,” according to an April 2009 email chain obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The email indicates that very early into her term as the country’s top diplomat, Clinton’s two closest aides were scandalized by their boss’ indifference towards email security. “This is so unbelievable, she should not be giving her email to everyone,” said a frustrated Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills in an April 3, 2009, email exchange with Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin. “Don’t get me started,” stated Abedin. “Personally, I think it’s outrageous.”

[314joey]

They dog poor Lochte and she gets a free pass.

[2manymustangs]

They dog poor Lochte and she gets a free pass.

read my siggy

[cdnoutlaw]

:) do you mean like MEXICO???

I don't have to imagine having a hostile/unfriendly country on our border...

Look what the Mexico (federal and local) govt has given us in exchange for all of the wealth/jobs we have given that nation...

Just saying!
And with that info of yours , thanks for agreeing with me/us.
We up here in Canada hope when it comes for you guys to vote , your selection will win over the other and be another great president for you guys[emoji846]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[314joey]

read my siggy

I read it every time I see one of your posts.........lol


We may just see this in 2020 or 2024.

[cdnoutlaw]

I'm cool with that, but could you take that no-talent Bieber back, he's yours and he's such a turd, we don't want him anymore......................lmao

You guys paid for him, your statute of limitation has run out your stuck with him!
Lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[The Doctor]

Read in the Los Angeles Times
Their attempt to bash a candidate. You might be surprised to see who . . .

"He's nothing but a B-List TV personality. He has no business being in politics."
"He's been divorced and remarried. He can't commit to anything."
"He's dangerously ignorant about international affairs. The Russian leaders will walk all over him."
"He has no filter - doesn't think before he speaks."
"Until recently, he was a Democrat. He's not a real Republican. He hasn't paid his GOP dues."
"He used to be Pro Choice. Now, suddenly he's Pro Life?"
"That can't be his real hair!"
"He's a loose cannon. No one wants HIS finger on the nuclear button."
"His opponent has the experience and political savvy to be president. He does not."
"He's just not presidential."
"His temperament disqualifies him from ever being Commander-In-Chief."
"He's proven himself to be mentally unstable."
"The military will never accept him as Commander-In-Chief. He's not smart enough."
"The GOP doesn't want him to be the head of the party. He could never reach across the aisle to get anything done."
"Most Republican voters will just stay home rather than go out and vote for him."
"Evangelicals will never support him."
"He says (Let’s) Make America Great Again. How dare he say we aren't still great?!?!"
"His intellect is thinner than spit on a slate rock.”
"90 percent of Republican state chairmen judge him guilty of simplistic approaches, with no depth in federal government administration and no experience in foreign affairs."
"His spontaneity with reporters and voters plays well but also gives him plenty of space to disgorge fantasies and factual errors so prolific and often outrageous that he single-handedly makes the word gaffe a permanent fixture in America’s political vernacular. He confuses Pakistan with Afghanistan. He claimed once that trees contributed 93 percent of the atmosphere’s nitrous oxide..."
"After all his gaffs, he doubles down on them instead of admitting he made a mistake."
"He's threatening to upend our treaties and relationships with our allies by demanding that they pay for their own defense!"
"Because of his gross factual errors he might take rash action and needlessly lead this country into open warfare!"
"He's racist, xenophobic, and fuels the fires of hatred!"
"You shouldn't take him seriously. He has a penchant for offering simplistic solutions to hideously complex problems and a stubborn insistence that he is always right in every argument.”
"The rising turnout of his voters are not loyal Republicans or Democrats and are alienated from both parties because neither takes a sympathetic view toward their issues.”
"He wears the disdain he draws from the GOP elites as a badge of honor. Henry Kissinger’s championing the other GOP candidate and attacking him are actually helping him!"
"The fact that he could be deemed a serious candidate for president is a shame and embarrassment for the country.” The New Yorker observed that his appeal “has to do not with competence at governing but with the emotion he evokes... [He] lets people get out their anger and frustration, their feeling of being misunderstood and mishandled by those who have run our government, their impatience with taxes and with the poor and the weak, their impulse to deal with the world’s troublemakers by employing the stratagem of a punch in the nose.”
"His unpopular opponent presided over the current Iranian crisis... and a reeling economy, yet surely the Democrat will prevail over him."
"Is he Safe? …he shoots from the hip … he's over his head … What are his solutions?”
"Voters want to follow some authority figure, — a leader who can take charge with authority; return a sense of discipline to our government; and, manifest the willpower needed to get this country back on track -- Or at least a leader from outside Washington,"

Sound familiar? You’ve heard this all about Donald Trump, right?

Try Again.
All this was said of Ronald Reagan in 1976 and 1980. Most of it was BY OTHER REPUBLICANS, and Reagan turned out to be arguably one of the greatest presidents of the 20th Century, if not of all time (excluding George Washington.)

[spike morelli]

Now after these last 8 years of "do-nothing" bullshit from Barack Obama, and the Democratic Party,....where is Bruce Springsteen, Oprah, and all the other noisemakers that applauded our current, and worst President in history. Where are all of the Bill Clinton supporters who turned a deaf ear to decency when our then "Commander in Chief" was spunking up interns?????? Where are these oh-so-proud people now? Are they really so Party oriented that they can't say wrong is wrong? Don't get me wrong, there are MANY Republicans who are just as guilty of being horrible public servants. But the outstanding FACT remains that Mr. Trump isn't one of them. Being a private citizen, Mr. Trump shoulders none of the blame for Government's and society's issues. Trump's question to Black Americans ( NOT African Americans ) , hols just as true for ALL concerned Americans who maybe aren't sure if they should vote for him......."What the hell do you have to loose?"

[2manymustangs]

Well Spike, here is proof positive that the DEMONcrat base has no soul/no conscience/no concept of right&wrong/no clue what it takes to make a nation GREAT and fair...

PROOF POSITIVE HERE... (http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/30/politics/john-mccain-debbie-wasserman-schultz-marco-rubio-primary/)

[314joey]

We live in Missouri and Florida and some of the silly liberal stuff that happens around here drives me nuts, (i.e. safe space talk, demonstrations), but we don't have anything like you guys have out West in Cali, like sanctuary cities, out of control homeless people, I don't know how you stand it, California is beautiful, but I couldn't ever live there.

[2manymustangs]

We live in Missouri and Florida and some of the silly liberal stuff that happens around here drives me nuts, (i.e. safe space talk, demonstrations), but we don't have anything like you guys have out West in Cali, like sanctuary cities, out of control homeless people, I don't know how you stand it, California is beautiful, but I couldn't ever live there.

the fact that wasserman got back in on the "D" side amazes me Joey...

[314joey]

the fact that wasserman got back in on the "D" side amazes me Joey...

Hopefully she'll lose in the national election, she's crazy.

[2manymustangs]

Hopefully she'll lose in the national election, she's crazy.

Bat shit crazy.... I've been researching and trying to find out how/if she is related to the Wasserman "hollywood elite" that has been funneling $$$ to Hitlery....


P.S. I liked the way TRUMP sounded last night.... :partyguy:

[riverrunner1984]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160909/0126c4cbc6a414b68078fee9f0faa45e.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[riverrunner1984]

http://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20160909/6fc93227ca872fbd7c9f6bbb72a6f735.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[314joey]

The Rock sings to Hillary, this is funnier than chit.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7jAieAn5GE

[Mrs.K034]

The Rock sings to Hillary, this is funnier than chit.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7jAieAn5GE

LOVE IT!!!! He just might be my new favorite person! Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HB Vic]

So whats up with Hillary? Pneumonia?

Have you seen the videos from today? I don't wish harm on anyone (well almost anyone), but that lady doesn't look well at all. If that concrete post wasn't there I'm pretty sure she would have been on the ground well before that transport van showed up.

Then a few hours later they show her on the street waiving at everyone like nothing happened.

Why not just come out and tell the truth? Why try to fool the pubic, again? Why try to keep something a secret that is so obvious you can no longer hide it?

Baffling.

[The Doctor]

Her physical health is very poor at best.
Sadly, her mental health is far worse.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfAPqvk80_c

[spike morelli]

I was telling my wife, that, at this point, I'm so cynical about that woman, that there could be two scenarios.........one, she does have health problems, and that's not a good thing right now for a presidential contender,......or two, what if it's just a bit of planned political maneuvering so that she doesn't have to talk to the media about all those "deplorable" people she insulted, or her poor showing with the "commander in chief" Q&A the other night. Go Trump....you know what to do,...when your opponent starts to lose their footing and swagger, hit 'em with a body punch, follow with one to the chin.

[314joey]

Poor poor Hillary

[HB Vic]

I think I need to change my name. As the former owner of this place, I would probably never post something like this.

But jeezus is this scary if its true.

https://youtu.be/OezFQluUVS0

[riverrunner1984]

So whats up with Hillary? Pneumonia?

Have you seen the videos from today? I don't wish harm on anyone (well almost anyone), but that lady doesn't look well at all. If that concrete post wasn't there I'm pretty sure she would have been on the ground well before that transport van showed up.

Then a few hours later they show her on the street waiving at everyone like nothing happened.

Why not just come out and tell the truth? Why try to fool the pubic, again? Why try to keep something a secret that is so obvious you can no longer hide it?

Baffling.

I finally watched the video of her leaving and almost eating shit on the side walk....I swear I may have looked like that a time or two after having 10 too many Jack and cokes at the club.....I couldn't help but LOL when I saw the video....I'm still laughing just thinking about it haha

[314joey]

She needs something.

[2manymustangs]

Executive Order 13526- Classified National Security Information (EO created in 2009 by BOBO)

This order prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information, including information relating to defense against transnational terrorism. Our democratic principles require that the American people be informed of the activities of their Government. Also, our Nation's progress depends on the free flow of information both within the Government and to the American people. Nevertheless, throughout our history, the national defense has required that certain information be maintained in confidence in order to protect our citizens, our democratic institutions, our homeland security, and our interactions with foreign nations. Protecting information critical to our Nation's security and demonstrating our commitment to open Government through accurate and accountable application of classification standards and routine, secure, and effective declassification are equally important priorities.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

PART 1 -- ORIGINAL CLASSIFICATION

Section 1.1. Classification Standards. (a) Information may be originally classified under the terms of this order only if all of the following conditions are met:

(1) an original classification authority is classifying the information;

(2) the information is owned by, produced by or for, or is under the control of the United States Government;

(3) the information falls within one or more of the categories of information listed in section 1.4 of this order; and

(4) the original classification authority determines that the unauthorized disclosure of the information reasonably could be expected to result in damage to the national security, which includes defense against transnational terrorism, and the original classification authority is able to identify or describe the damage.

(b) If there is significant doubt about the need to classify information, it shall not be classified. This provision does not:

(1) amplify or modify the substantive criteria or procedures for classification; or

(2) create any substantive or procedural rights subject to judicial review.

(c) Classified information shall not be declassified automatically as a result of any unauthorized disclosure of identical or similar information.

(d) The unauthorized disclosure of foreign government information is presumed to cause damage to the national security.

Sec. 1.2. Classification Levels. (a) Information may be classified at one of the following three levels:

(1) "Top Secret" shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.

(2) "Secret" shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.

(3) "Confidential" shall be applied to information, the unauthorized disclosure of which reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security that the original classification authority is able to identify or describe.

(b) Except as otherwise provided by statute, no other terms shall be used to identify United States classified information.

(c) If there is significant doubt about the appropriate level of classification, it shall be classified at the lower level.

Sec. 1.3. Classification Authority. (a) The authority to classify information originally may be exercised only by:

(1) the President and the Vice President;

(2) agency heads and officials designated by the President; and

(3) United States Government officials delegated this authority pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section.

(b) Officials authorized to classify information at a specified level are also authorized to classify information at a lower level.

(c) Delegation of original classification authority.

(1) Delegations of original classification authority shall be limited to the minimum required to administer this order. Agency heads are responsible for ensuring that designated subordinate officials have a demonstrable and continuing need to exercise this authority.

(2) "Top Secret" original classification authority may be delegated only by the President, the Vice President, or an agency head or official designated pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section.

(3) "Secret" or "Confidential" original classification authority may be delegated only by the President, the Vice President, an agency head or official designated pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section, or the senior agency official designated under section 5.4(d) of this order, provided that official has been delegated "Top Secret" original classification authority by the agency head.

(4) Each delegation of original classification authority shall be in writing and the authority shall not be redelegated except as provided in this order. Each delegation shall identify the official by name or position.

(5) Delegations of original classification authority shall be reported or made available by name or position to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office.

(d) All original classification authorities must receive training in proper classification (including the avoidance of over-classification) and declassification as provided in this order and its implementing directives at least once a calendar year. Such training must include instruction on the proper safeguarding of classified information and on the sanctions in section 5.5 of this order that may be brought against an individual who fails to classify information properly or protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure. Original classification authorities who do not receive such mandatory training at least once within a calendar year shall have their classification authority suspended by the agency head or the senior agency official designated under section 5.4(d) of this order until such training has taken place. A waiver may be granted by the agency head, the deputy agency head, or the senior agency official if an individual is unable to receive such training due to unavoidable circumstances. Whenever a waiver is granted, the individual shall receive such training as soon as practicable.

(e) Exceptional cases. When an employee, government contractor, licensee, certificate holder, or grantee of an agency who does not have original classification authority originates information believed by that person to require classification, the information shall be protected in a manner consistent with this order and its implementing directives. The information shall be transmitted promptly as provided under this order or its implementing directives to the agency that has appropriate subject matter interest and classification authority with respect to this information. That agency shall decide within 30 days whether to classify this information.

Sec. 1.4. Classification Categories. Information shall not be considered for classification unless its unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause identifiable or describable damage to the national security in accordance with section 1.2 of this order, and it pertains to one or more of the following:

(a) military plans, weapons systems, or operations;

(b) foreign government information;

(c) intelligence activities (including covert action), intelligence sources or methods, or cryptology;

(d) foreign relations or foreign activities of the United States, including confidential sources;

(e) scientific, technological, or economic matters relating to the national security;

(f) United States Government programs for safeguarding nuclear materials or facilities;

(g) vulnerabilities or capabilities of systems, installations, infrastructures, projects, plans, or protection services relating to the national security; or

(h) the development, production, or use of weapons of mass destruction.

Sec. 1.5. Duration of Classification. (a) At the time of original classification, the original classification authority shall establish a specific date or event for declassification based on the duration of the national security sensitivity of the information. Upon reaching the date or event, the information shall be automatically declassified. Except for information that should clearly and demonstrably be expected to reveal the identity of a confidential human source or a human intelligence source or key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction, the date or event shall not exceed the time frame established in paragraph (b) of this section.

(b) If the original classification authority cannot determine an earlier specific date or event for declassification, information shall be marked for declassification 10 years from the date of the original decision, unless the original classification authority otherwise determines that the sensitivity of the information requires that it be marked for declassification for up to 25 years from the date of the original decision.

(c) An original classification authority may extend the duration of classification up to 25 years from the date of origin of the document, change the level of classification, or reclassify specific information only when the standards and procedures for classifying information under this order are followed.

(d) No information may remain classified indefinitely. Information marked for an indefinite duration of classification under predecessor orders, for example, marked as "Originating Agency's Determination Required," or classified information that contains incomplete declassification instructions or lacks declassification instructions shall be declassified in accordance with part 3 of this order.

Sec. 1.6. Identification and Markings. (a) At the time of original classification, the following shall be indicated in a manner that is immediately apparent:

(1) one of the three classification levels defined in section 1.2 of this order;

(2) the identity, by name and position, or by personal identifier, of the original classification authority;

(3) the agency and office of origin, if not otherwise evident;

(4) declassification instructions, which shall indicate one of the following:

(A) the date or event for declassification, as prescribed in section 1.5(a);

(B) the date that is 10 years from the date of original classification, as prescribed in section 1.5(b);

(C) the date that is up to 25 years from the date of original classification, as prescribed in section 1.5(b); or

(D) in the case of information that should clearly and demonstrably be expected to reveal the identity of a confidential human source or a human intelligence source or key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction, the marking prescribed in implementing directives issued pursuant to this order; and

(5) a concise reason for classification that, at a minimum, cites the applicable classification categories in section 1.4 of this order.

(b) Specific information required in paragraph (a) of this section may be excluded if it would reveal additional classified information.

(c) With respect to each classified document, the agency originating the document shall, by marking or other means, indicate which portions are classified, with the applicable classification level, and which portions are unclassified. In accordance with standards prescribed in directives issued under this order, the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office may grant and revoke temporary waivers of this requirement. The Director shall revoke any waiver upon a finding of abuse.

(d) Markings or other indicia implementing the provisions of this order, including abbreviations and requirements to safeguard classified working papers, shall conform to the standards prescribed in implementing directives issued pursuant to this order.

(e) Foreign government information shall retain its original classification markings or shall be assigned a U.S. classification that provides a degree of protection at least equivalent to that required by the entity that furnished the information. Foreign government information retaining its original classification markings need not be assigned a U.S. classification marking provided that the responsible agency determines that the foreign government markings are adequate to meet the purposes served by U.S. classification markings.

(f) Information assigned a level of classification under this or predecessor orders shall be considered as classified at that level of classification despite the omission of other required markings. Whenever such information is used in the derivative classification process or is reviewed for possible declassification, holders of such information shall coordinate with an appropriate classification authority for the application of omitted markings.

(g) The classification authority shall, whenever practicable, use a classified addendum whenever classified information constitutes a small portion of an otherwise unclassified document or prepare a product to allow for dissemination at the lowest level of classification possible or in unclassified form.

(h) Prior to public release, all declassified records shall be appropriately marked to reflect their declassification.

Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations.
(a) In no case shall information be classified, continue to be maintained as classified, or fail to be declassified in order to:
(1) conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error;

(2) prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency;

(3) restrain competition; or

(4) prevent or delay the release of information that does not require protection in the interest of the national security.

(b) Basic scientific research information not clearly related to the national security shall not be classified.

(c) Information may not be reclassified after declassification and release to the public under proper authority unless:

(1) the reclassification is personally approved in writing by the agency head based on a document-by-document determination by the agency that reclassification is required to prevent significant and demonstrable damage to the national security;

(2) the information may be reasonably recovered without bringing undue attention to the information;

(3) the reclassification action is reported promptly to the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (National Security Advisor) and the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office; and

(4) for documents in the physical and legal custody of the National Archives and Records Administration (National Archives) that have been available for public use, the agency head has, after making the determinations required by this paragraph, notified the Archivist of the United States (Archivist), who shall suspend public access pending approval of the reclassification action by the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office. Any such decision by the Director may be appealed by the agency head to the President through the National Security Advisor. Public access shall remain suspended pending a prompt decision on the appeal.

(d) Information that has not previously been disclosed to the public under proper authority may be classified or reclassified after an agency has received a request for it under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the Presidential Records Act, 44 U.S.C. 2204(c)(1), the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), or the mandatory review provisions of section 3.5 of this order only if such classification meets the requirements of this order and is accomplished on a document-by-document basis with the personal participation or under the direction of the agency head, the deputy agency head, or the senior agency official designated under section 5.4 of this order. The requirements in this paragraph also apply to those situations in which information has been declassified in accordance with a specific date or event determined by an original classification authority in accordance with section 1.5 of this order.

(e) Compilations of items of information that are individually unclassified may be classified if the compiled information reveals an additional association or relationship that: (1) meets the standards for classification under this order; and (2) is not otherwise revealed in the individual items of information.

Sec. 1.8. Classification Challenges. (a) Authorized holders of information who, in good faith, believe that its classification status is improper are encouraged and expected to challenge the classification status of the information in accordance with agency procedures established under paragraph (b) of this section.

(b) In accordance with implementing directives issued pursuant to this order, an agency head or senior agency official shall establish procedures under which authorized holders of information, including authorized holders outside the classifying agency, are encouraged and expected to challenge the classification of information that they believe is improperly classified or unclassified. These procedures shall ensure that:

(1) individuals are not subject to retribution for bringing such actions;

(2) an opportunity is provided for review by an impartial official or panel; and

(3) individuals are advised of their right to appeal agency decisions to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (Panel) established by section 5.3 of this order.

(c) Documents required to be submitted for prepublication review or other administrative process pursuant to an approved nondisclosure agreement are not covered by this section.

Sec. 1.9. Fundamental Classification Guidance Review.
(a) Agency heads shall complete on a periodic basis a comprehensive review of the agency's classification guidance, particularly classification guides, to ensure the guidance reflects current circumstances and to identify classified information that no longer requires protection and can be declassified. The initial fundamental classification guidance review shall be completed within 2 years of the effective date of this order.

(b) The classification guidance review shall include an evaluation of classified information to determine if it meets the standards for classification under section 1.4 of this order, taking into account an up-to-date assessment of likely damage as described under section 1.2 of this order.

(c) The classification guidance review shall include original classification authorities and agency subject matter experts to ensure a broad range of perspectives.

(d) Agency heads shall provide a report summarizing the results of the classification guidance review to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office and shall release an unclassified version of this report to the public.

PART 2 -- DERIVATIVE CLASSIFICATION

Sec. 2.1. Use of Derivative Classification. (a) Persons who reproduce, extract, or summarize classified information, or who apply classification markings derived from source material or as directed by a classification guide, need not possess original classification authority.

(b) Persons who apply derivative classification markings shall:
(1) be identified by name and position, or by personal identifier, in a manner that is immediately apparent for each derivative classification action;

(2) observe and respect original classification decisions; and

(3) carry forward to any newly created documents the pertinent classification markings. For information derivatively classified based on multiple sources, the derivative classifier shall carry forward:

(A) the date or event for declassification that corresponds to the longest period of classification among the sources, or the marking established pursuant to section 1.6(a)(4)(D) of this order; and

(B) a listing of the source materials.

(c) Derivative classifiers shall, whenever practicable, use a classified addendum whenever classified information constitutes a small portion of an otherwise unclassified document or prepare a product to allow for dissemination at the lowest level of classification possible or in unclassified form.

(d) Persons who apply derivative classification markings shall receive training in the proper application of the derivative classification principles of the order, with an emphasis on avoiding over-classification, at least once every 2 years. Derivative classifiers who do not receive such training at least once every 2 years shall have their authority to apply derivative classification markings suspended until they have received such training. A waiver may be granted by the agency head, the deputy agency head, or the senior agency official if an individual is unable to receive such training due to unavoidable circumstances. Whenever a waiver is granted, the individual shall receive such training as soon as practicable.

Sec. 2.2. Classification Guides. (a) Agencies with original classification authority shall prepare classification guides to facilitate the proper and uniform derivative classification of information. These guides shall conform to standards contained in directives issued under this order.

(b) Each guide shall be approved personally and in writing by an official who:

(1) has program or supervisory responsibility over the information or is the senior agency official; and

(2) is authorized to classify information originally at the highest level of classification prescribed in the guide.

(c) Agencies shall establish procedures to ensure that classification guides are reviewed and updated as provided in directives issued under this order.

(d) Agencies shall incorporate original classification decisions into classification guides on a timely basis and in accordance with directives issued under this order.

(e) Agencies may incorporate exemptions from automatic declassification approved pursuant to section 3.3(j) of this order into classification guides, provided that the Panel is notified of the intent to take such action for specific information in advance of approval and the information remains in active use.

(f) The duration of classification of a document classified by a derivative classifier using a classification guide shall not exceed 25 years from the date of the origin of the document, except for:

(1) information that should clearly and demonstrably be expected to reveal the identity of a confidential human source or a human intelligence source or key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction; and

(2) specific information incorporated into classification guides in accordance with section 2.2(e) of this order.

PART 3 -- DECLASSIFICATION AND DOWNGRADING

Sec. 3.1. Authority for Declassification. (a) Information shall be declassified as soon as it no longer meets the standards for classification under this order.

(b) Information shall be declassified or downgraded by:

(1) the official who authorized the original classification, if that official is still serving in the same position and has original classification authority;

(2) the originator's current successor in function, if that individual has original classification authority;

(3) a supervisory official of either the originator or his or her successor in function, if the supervisory official has original classification authority; or

(4) officials delegated declassification authority in writing by the agency head or the senior agency official of the originating agency.

(c) The Director of National Intelligence (or, if delegated by the Director of National Intelligence, the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence) may, with respect to the Intelligence Community, after consultation with the head of the originating Intelligence Community element or department, declassify, downgrade, or direct the declassification or downgrading of information or intelligence relating to intelligence sources, methods, or activities.

(d) It is presumed that information that continues to meet the classification requirements under this order requires continued protection. In some exceptional cases, however, the need to protect such information may be outweighed by the public interest in disclosure of the information, and in these cases the information should be declassified. When such questions arise, they shall be referred to the agency head or the senior agency official. That official will determine, as an exercise of discretion, whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the damage to the national security that might reasonably be expected from disclosure. This provision does not:

(1) amplify or modify the substantive criteria or procedures for classification; or

(2) create any substantive or procedural rights subject to judicial review.

(e) If the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office determines that information is classified in violation of this order, the Director may require the information to be declassified by the agency that originated the classification. Any such decision by the Director may be appealed to the President through the National Security Advisor. The information shall remain classified pending a prompt decision on the appeal.

(f) The provisions of this section shall also apply to agencies that, under the terms of this order, do not have original classification authority, but had such authority under predecessor orders.

(g) No information may be excluded from declassification under section 3.3 of this order based solely on the type of document or record in which it is found. Rather, the classified information must be considered on the basis of its content.

(h) Classified nonrecord materials, including artifacts, shall be declassified as soon as they no longer meet the standards for classification under this order.

(i) When making decisions under sections 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5 of this order, agencies shall consider the final decisions of the Panel.

Sec. 3.2. Transferred Records. (a) In the case of classified records transferred in conjunction with a transfer of functions, and not merely for storage purposes, the receiving agency shall be deemed to be the originating agency for purposes of this order.

(b) In the case of classified records that are not officially transferred as described in paragraph (a) of this section, but that originated in an agency that has ceased to exist and for which there is no successor agency, each agency in possession of such records shall be deemed to be the originating agency for purposes of this order. Such records may be declassified or downgraded by the agency in possession of the records after consultation with any other agency that has an interest in the subject matter of the records.

(c) Classified records accessioned into the National Archives shall be declassified or downgraded by the Archivist in accordance with this order, the directives issued pursuant to this order, agency declassification guides, and any existing procedural agreement between the Archivist and the relevant agency head.

(d) The originating agency shall take all reasonable steps to declassify classified information contained in records determined to have permanent historical value before they are accessioned into the National Archives. However, the Archivist may require that classified records be accessioned into the National Archives when necessary to comply with the provisions of the Federal Records Act. This provision does not apply to records transferred to the Archivist pursuant to section 2203 of title 44, United States Code, or records for which the National Archives serves as the custodian of the records of an agency or organization that has gone out of existence.

(e) To the extent practicable, agencies shall adopt a system of records management that will facilitate the public release of documents at the time such documents are declassified pursuant to the provisions for automatic declassification in section 3.3 of this order.

Sec. 3.3. Automatic Declassification. (a) Subject to paragraphs (b)–(d) and (g)–(j) of this section, all classified records that (1) are more than 25 years old and (2) have been determined to have permanent historical value under title 44, United States Code, shall be automatically declassified whether or not the records have been reviewed. All classified records shall be automatically declassified on December 31 of the year that is 25 years from the date of origin, except as provided in paragraphs (b)–(d) and (g)–(i) of this section. If the date of origin of an individual record cannot be readily determined, the date of original classification shall be used instead.

(b) An agency head may exempt from automatic declassification under paragraph (a) of this section specific information, the release of which should clearly and demonstrably be expected to:

(1) reveal the identity of a confidential human source, a human intelligence source, a relationship with an intelligence or security service of a foreign government or international organization, or a nonhuman intelligence source; or impair the effectiveness of an intelligence method currently in use, available for use, or under development;

(2) reveal information that would assist in the development, production, or use of weapons of mass destruction;

(3) reveal information that would impair U.S. cryptologic systems or activities;

(4) reveal information that would impair the application of state-of-the-art technology within a U.S. weapon system;

(5) reveal formally named or numbered U.S. military war plans that remain in effect, or reveal operational or tactical elements of prior plans that are contained in such active plans;

(6) reveal information, including foreign government information, that would cause serious harm to relations between the United States and a foreign government, or to ongoing diplomatic activities of the United States;

(7) reveal information that would impair the current ability of United States Government officials to protect the President, Vice President, and other protectees for whom protection services, in the interest of the national security, are authorized;

(8) reveal information that would seriously impair current national security emergency preparedness plans or reveal current vulnerabilities of systems, installations, or infrastructures relating to the national security; or

(9) violate a statute, treaty, or international agreement that does not permit the automatic or unilateral declassification of information at 25 years.

(c)(1) An agency head shall notify the Panel of any specific file series of records for which a review or assessment has determined that the information within that file series almost invariably falls within one or more of the exemption categories listed in paragraph (b) of this section and that the agency proposes to exempt from automatic declassification at 25 years.

(2) The notification shall include:

(A) a description of the file series;

(B) an explanation of why the information within the file series is almost invariably exempt from automatic declassification and why the information must remain classified for a longer period of time; and

(C) except when the information within the file series almost invariably identifies a confidential human source or a human intelligence source or key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction, a specific date or event for declassification of the information, not to exceed December 31 of the year that is 50 years from the date of origin of the records.

(3) The Panel may direct the agency not to exempt a designated file series or to declassify the information within that series at an earlier date than recommended. The agency head may appeal such a decision to the President through the National Security Advisor.

(4) File series exemptions approved by the President prior to December 31, 2008, shall remain valid without any additional agency action pending Panel review by the later of December 31, 2010, or December 31 of the year that is 10 years from the date of previous approval.

(d) The following provisions shall apply to the onset of automatic declassification:

(1) Classified records within an integral file block, as defined in this order, that are otherwise subject to automatic declassification under this section shall not be automatically declassified until December 31 of the year that is 25 years from the date of the most recent record within the file block.

(2) After consultation with the Director of the National Declassification Center (the Center) established by section 3.7 of this order and before the records are subject to automatic declassification, an agency head or senior agency official may delay automatic declassification for up to five additional years for classified information contained in media that make a review for possible declassification exemptions more difficult or costly.

(3) Other than for records that are properly exempted from automatic declassification, records containing classified information that originated with other agencies or the disclosure of which would affect the interests or activities of other agencies with respect to the classified information and could reasonably be expected to fall under one or more of the exemptions in paragraph (b) of this section shall be identified prior to the onset of automatic declassification for later referral to those agencies.

(A) The information of concern shall be referred by the Center established by section 3.7 of this order, or by the centralized facilities referred to in section 3.7(e) of this order, in a prioritized and scheduled manner determined by the Center.

(B) If an agency fails to provide a final determination on a referral made by the Center within 1 year of referral, or by the centralized facilities referred to in section 3.7(e) of this order within 3 years of referral, its equities in the referred records shall be automatically declassified.

(C) If any disagreement arises between affected agencies and the Center regarding the referral review period, the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office shall determine the appropriate period of review of referred records.

(D) Referrals identified prior to the establishment of the Center by section 3.7 of this order shall be subject to automatic declassification only in accordance with subparagraphs (d)(3)(A)–(C) of this section.

(4) After consultation with the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office, an agency head may delay automatic declassification for up to 3 years from the date of discovery of classified records that were inadvertently not reviewed prior to the effective date of automatic declassification.

(e) Information exempted from automatic declassification under this section shall remain subject to the mandatory and systematic declassification review provisions of this order.

(f) The Secretary of State shall determine when the United States should commence negotiations with the appropriate officials of a foreign government or international organization of governments to modify any treaty or international agreement that requires the classification of information contained in records affected by this section for a period longer than 25 years from the date of its creation, unless the treaty or international agreement pertains to information that may otherwise remain classified beyond 25 years under this section.

(g) The Secretary of Energy shall determine when information concerning foreign nuclear programs that was removed from the Restricted Data category in order to carry out provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, may be declassified. Unless otherwise determined, such information shall be declassified when comparable information concerning the United States nuclear program is declassified.

(h) Not later than 3 years from the effective date of this order, all records exempted from automatic declassification under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section shall be automatically declassified on December 31 of a year that is no more than 50 years from the date of origin, subject to the following:

(1) Records that contain information the release of which should clearly and demonstrably be expected to reveal the following are exempt from automatic declassification at 50 years:

(A) the identity of a confidential human source or a human intelligence source; or

(B) key design concepts of weapons of mass destruction.

(2) In extraordinary cases, agency heads may, within 5 years of the onset of automatic declassification, propose to exempt additional specific information from declassification at 50 years.

(3) Records exempted from automatic declassification under this paragraph shall be automatically declassified on December 31 of a year that is no more than 75 years from the date of origin unless an agency head, within 5 years of that date, proposes to exempt specific information from declassification at 75 years and the proposal is formally approved by the Panel.

(i) Specific records exempted from automatic declassification prior to the establishment of the Center described in section 3.7 of this order shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph (h) of this section in a scheduled and prioritized manner determined by the Center.

(j) At least 1 year before information is subject to automatic declassification under this section, an agency head or senior agency official shall notify the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office, serving as Executive Secretary of the Panel, of any specific information that the agency proposes to exempt from automatic declassification under paragraphs (b) and (h) of this section.

(1) The notification shall include:

(A) a detailed description of the information, either by reference to information in specific records or in the form of a declassification guide;

(B) an explanation of why the information should be exempt from automatic declassification and must remain classified for a longer period of time; and

(C) a specific date or a specific and independently verifiable event for automatic declassification of specific records that contain the information proposed for exemption.

(2) The Panel may direct the agency not to exempt the information or to declassify it at an earlier date than recommended. An agency head may appeal such a decision to the President through the National Security Advisor. The information will remain classified while such an appeal is pending.

(k) For information in a file series of records determined not to have permanent historical value, the duration of classification beyond 25 years shall be the same as the disposition (destruction) date of those records in each Agency Records Control Schedule or General Records Schedule, although the duration of classification shall be extended if the record has been retained for business reasons beyond the scheduled disposition date.

Sec. 3.4. Systematic Declassification Review. (a) Each agency that has originated classified information under this order or its predecessors shall establish and conduct a program for systematic declassification review for records of permanent historical value exempted from automatic declassification under section 3.3 of this order. Agencies shall prioritize their review of such records in accordance with priorities established by the Center.

(b) The Archivist shall conduct a systematic declassification review program for classified records: (1) accessioned into the National Archives; (2) transferred to the Archivist pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2203; and (3) for which the National Archives serves as the custodian for an agency or organization that has gone out of existence.

Sec. 3.5. Mandatory Declassification Review. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all information classified under this order or predecessor orders shall be subject to a review for declassification by the originating agency if:

(1) the request for a review describes the document or material containing the information with sufficient specificity to enable the agency to locate it with a reasonable amount of effort;

(2) the document or material containing the information responsive to the request is not contained within an operational file exempted from search and review, publication, and disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552 in accordance with law; and

(3) the information is not the subject of pending litigation.

(b) Information originated by the incumbent President or the incumbent Vice President; the incumbent President's White House Staff or the incumbent Vice President's Staff; committees, commissions, or boards appointed by the incumbent President; or other entities within the Executive Office of the President that solely advise and assist the incumbent President is exempted from the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section. However, the Archivist shall have the authority to review, downgrade, and declassify papers or records of former Presidents and Vice Presidents under the control of the Archivist pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2107, 2111, 2111 note, or 2203. Review procedures developed by the Archivist shall provide for consultation with agencies having primary subject matter interest and shall be consistent with the provisions of applicable laws or lawful agreements that pertain to the respective Presidential papers or records. Agencies with primary subject matter interest shall be notified promptly of the Archivist's decision. Any final decision by the Archivist may be appealed by the requester or an agency to the Panel. The information shall remain classified pending a prompt decision on the appeal.

(c) Agencies conducting a mandatory review for declassification shall declassify information that no longer meets the standards for classification under this order. They shall release this information unless withholding is otherwise authorized and warranted under applicable law.

(d) If an agency has reviewed the requested information for declassification within the past 2 years, the agency need not conduct another review and may instead inform the requester of this fact and the prior review decision and advise the requester of appeal rights provided under subsection (e) of this section.

(e) In accordance with directives issued pursuant to this order, agency heads shall develop procedures to process requests for the mandatory review of classified information. These procedures shall apply to information classified under this or predecessor orders. They also shall provide a means for administratively appealing a denial of a mandatory review request, and for notifying the requester of the right to appeal a final agency decision to the Panel.

(f) After consultation with affected agencies, the Secretary of Defense shall develop special procedures for the review of cryptologic information; the Director of National Intelligence shall develop special procedures for the review of information pertaining to intelligence sources, methods, and activities; and the Archivist shall develop special procedures for the review of information accessioned into the National Archives.

(g) Documents required to be submitted for prepublication review or other administrative process pursuant to an approved nondisclosure agreement are not covered by this section.

(h) This section shall not apply to any request for a review made to an element of the Intelligence Community that is made by a person other than an individual as that term is defined by 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(2), or by a foreign government entity or any representative thereof.

Sec. 3.6. Processing Requests and Reviews. Notwithstanding section 4.1(i) of this order, in response to a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act, the Presidential Records Act, the Privacy Act of 1974, or the mandatory review provisions of this order:

(a) An agency may refuse to confirm or deny the existence or nonexistence of requested records whenever the fact of their existence or nonexistence is itself classified under this order or its predecessors.

(b) When an agency receives any request for documents in its custody that contain classified information that originated with other agencies or the disclosure of which would affect the interests or activities of other agencies with respect to the classified information, or identifies such documents in the process of implementing sections 3.3 or 3.4 of this order, it shall refer copies of any request and the pertinent documents to the originating agency for processing and may, after consultation with the originating agency, inform any requester of the referral unless such association is itself classified under this order or its predecessors. In cases in which the originating agency determines in writing that a response under paragraph (a) of this section is required, the referring agency shall respond to the requester in accordance with that paragraph.

(c) Agencies may extend the classification of information in records determined not to have permanent historical value or nonrecord materials, including artifacts, beyond the time frames established in sections 1.5(b) and 2.2(f) of this order, provided:

(1) the specific information has been approved pursuant to section 3.3(j) of this order for exemption from automatic declassification; and

(2) the extension does not exceed the date established in section 3.3(j) of this order.

Sec. 3.7. National Declassification Center (a) There is established within the National Archives a National Declassification Center to streamline declassification processes, facilitate quality-assurance measures, and implement standardized training regarding the declassification of records determined to have permanent historical value. There shall be a Director of the Center who shall be appointed or removed by the Archivist in consultation with the Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence.

(b) Under the administration of the Director, the Center shall coordinate:

(1) timely and appropriate processing of referrals in accordance with section 3.3(d)(3) of this order for accessioned Federal records and transferred presidential records.

(2) general interagency declassification activities necessary to fulfill the requirements of sections 3.3 and 3.4 of this order;

(3) the exchange among agencies of detailed declassification guidance to enable the referral of records in accordance with section 3.3(d)(3) of this order;

(4) the development of effective, transparent, and standard declassification work processes, training, and quality assurance measures;

(5) the development of solutions to declassification challenges posed by electronic records, special media, and emerging technologies;

(6) the linkage and effective utilization of existing agency databases and the use of new technologies to document and make public declassification review decisions and support declassification activities under the purview of the Center; and

(7) storage and related services, on a reimbursable basis, for Federal records containing classified national security information.

(c) Agency heads shall fully cooperate with the Archivist in the activities of the Center and shall:

(1) provide the Director with adequate and current declassification guidance to enable the referral of records in accordance with section 3.3(d)(3) of this order; and

(2) upon request of the Archivist, assign agency personnel to the Center who shall be delegated authority by the agency head to review and exempt or declassify information originated by their agency contained in records accessioned into the National Archives, after consultation with subject-matter experts as necessary.

(d) The Archivist, in consultation with representatives of the participants in the Center and after input from the general public, shall develop priorities for declassification activities under the purview of the Center that take into account the degree of researcher interest and the likelihood of declassification.

(e) Agency heads may establish such centralized facilities and internal operations to conduct internal declassification reviews as appropriate to achieve optimized records management and declassification business processes. Once established, all referral processing of accessioned records shall take place at the Center, and such agency facilities and operations shall be coordinated with the Center to ensure the maximum degree of consistency in policies and procedures that relate to records determined to have permanent historical value.

(f) Agency heads may exempt from automatic declassification or continue the classification of their own originally classified information under section 3.3(a) of this order except that in the case of the Director of National Intelligence, the Director shall also retain such authority with respect to the Intelligence Community.

(g) The Archivist shall, in consultation with the Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, and the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office, provide the National Security Advisor with a detailed concept of operations for the Center and a proposed implementing directive under section 5.1 of this order that reflects the coordinated views of the aforementioned agencies.

PART 4 -- SAFEGUARDING

Sec. 4.1. General Restrictions on Access. (a) A person may have access to classified information provided that:

(1) a favorable determination of eligibility for access has been made by an agency head or the agency head's designee;

(2) the person has signed an approved nondisclosure agreement; and

(3) the person has a need-to-know the information.

(b) Every person who has met the standards for access to classified information in paragraph (a) of this section shall receive contemporaneous training on the proper safeguarding of classified information and on the criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions that may be imposed on an individual who fails to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure.

(c) An official or employee leaving agency service may not remove classified information from the agency's control or direct that information be declassified in order to remove it from agency control.

(d) Classified information may not be removed from official premises without proper authorization.

(e) Persons authorized to disseminate classified information outside the executive branch shall ensure the protection of the information in a manner equivalent to that provided within the executive branch.

(f) Consistent with law, executive orders, directives, and regulations, an agency head or senior agency official or, with respect to the Intelligence Community, the Director of National Intelligence, shall establish uniform procedures to ensure that automated information systems, including networks and telecommunications systems, that collect, create, communicate, compute, disseminate, process, or store classified information:

(1) prevent access by unauthorized persons;

(2) ensure the integrity of the information; and

(3) to the maximum extent practicable, use:

(A) common information technology standards, protocols, and interfaces that maximize the availability of, and access to, the information in a form and manner that facilitates its authorized use; and

(B) standardized electronic formats to maximize the accessibility of information to persons who meet the criteria set forth in section 4.1(a) of this order.

(g) Consistent with law, executive orders, directives, and regulations, each agency head or senior agency official, or with respect to the Intelligence Community, the Director of National Intelligence, shall establish controls to ensure that classified information is used, processed, stored, reproduced, transmitted, and destroyed under conditions that provide adequate protection and prevent access by unauthorized persons.

(h) Consistent with directives issued pursuant to this order, an agency shall safeguard foreign government information under standards that provide a degree of protection at least equivalent to that required by the government or international organization of governments that furnished the information. When adequate to achieve equivalency, these standards may be less restrictive than the safeguarding standards that ordinarily apply to U.S. "Confidential" information, including modified handling and transmission and allowing access to individuals with a need-to-know who have not otherwise been cleared for access to classified information or executed an approved nondisclosure agreement.

(i)(1) Classified information originating in one agency may be disseminated to another agency or U.S. entity by any agency to which it has been made available without the consent of the originating agency, as long as the criteria for access under section 4.1(a) of this order are met, unless the originating agency has determined that prior authorization is required for such dissemination and has marked or indicated such requirement on the medium containing the classified information in accordance with implementing directives issued pursuant to this order.

(2) Classified information originating in one agency may be disseminated by any other agency to which it has been made available to a foreign government in accordance with statute, this order, directives implementing this order, direction of the President, or with the consent of the originating agency. For the purposes of this section, "foreign government" includes any element of a foreign government, or an international organization of governments, or any element thereof.

(3) Documents created prior to the effective date of this order shall not be disseminated outside any other agency to which they have been made available without the consent of the originating agency. An agency head or senior agency official may waive this requirement for specific information that originated within that agency.

(4) For purposes of this section, the Department of Defense shall be considered one agency, except that any dissemination of information regarding intelligence sources, methods, or activities shall be consistent with directives issued pursuant to section 6.2(b) of this order.

(5) Prior consent of the originating agency is not required when referring records for declassification review that contain information originating in more than one agency.

Sec. 4.2. Distribution Controls. (a) The head of each agency shall establish procedures in accordance with applicable law and consistent with directives issued pursuant to this order to ensure that classified information is accessible to the maximum extent possible by individuals who meet the criteria set forth in section 4.1(a) of this order.

(b) In an emergency, when necessary to respond to an imminent threat to life or in defense of the homeland, the agency head or any designee may authorize the disclosure of classified information (including information marked pursuant to section 4.1(i)(1) of this order) to an individual or individuals who are otherwise not eligible for access. Such actions shall be taken only in accordance with directives implementing this order and any procedure issued by agencies governing the classified information, which shall be designed to minimize the classified information that is disclosed under these circumstances and the number of individuals who receive it. Information disclosed under this provision or implementing directives and procedures shall not be deemed declassified as a result of such disclosure or subsequent use by a recipient. Such disclosures shall be reported promptly to the originator of the classified information. For purposes of this section, the Director of National Intelligence may issue an implementing directive governing the emergency disclosure of classified intelligence information.

(c) Each agency shall update, at least annually, the automatic, routine, or recurring distribution mechanism for classified information that it distributes. Recipients shall cooperate fully with distributors who are updating distribution lists and shall notify distributors whenever a relevant change in status occurs.

Sec. 4.3. Special Access Programs. (a) Establishment of special access programs. Unless otherwise authorized by the President, only the Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, or the principal deputy of each, may create a special access program. For special access programs pertaining to intelligence sources, methods, and activities (but not including military operational, strategic, and tactical programs), this function shall be exercised by the Director of National Intelligence. These officials shall keep the number of these programs at an absolute minimum, and shall establish them only when the program is required by statute or upon a specific finding that:

(1) the vulnerability of, or threat to, specific information is exceptional; and

(2) the normal criteria for determining eligibility for access applicable to information classified at the same level are not deemed sufficient to protect the information from unauthorized disclosure.

(b) Requirements and limitations. (1) Special access programs shall be limited to programs in which the number of persons who ordinarily will have access will be reasonably small and commensurate with the objective of providing enhanced protection for the information involved.

(2) Each agency head shall establish and maintain a system of accounting for special access programs consistent with directives issued pursuant to this order.

(3) Special access programs shall be subject to the oversight program established under section 5.4(d) of this order. In addition, the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office shall be afforded access to these programs, in accordance with the security requirements of each program, in order to perform the functions assigned to the Information Security Oversight Office under this order. An agency head may limit access to a special access program to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office and no more than one other employee of the Information Security Oversight Office or, for special access programs that are extraordinarily sensitive and vulnerable, to the Director only.

(4) The agency head or principal deputy shall review annually each special access program to determine whether it continues to meet the requirements of this order.

(5) Upon request, an agency head shall brief the National Security Advisor, or a designee, on any or all of the agency's special access programs.

(6) For the purposes of this section, the term "agency head" refers only to the Secretaries of State, Defense, Energy, and Homeland Security, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, or the principal deputy of each.

(c) Nothing in this order shall supersede any requirement made by or under 10 U.S.C. 119.

Sec. 4.4. Access by Historical Researchers and Certain Former Government Personnel. (a) The requirement in section 4.1(a)(3) of this order that access to classified information may be granted only to individuals who have a need to-know the information may be waived for persons who:

(1) are engaged in historical research projects;

(2) previously have occupied senior policy-making positions to which they were appointed or designated by the President or the Vice President; or

(3) served as President or Vice President.

(b) Waivers under this section may be granted only if the agency head or senior agency official of the originating agency:

(1) determines in writing that access is consistent with the interest of the national security;

(2) takes appropriate steps to protect classified information from unauthorized disclosure or compromise, and ensures that the information is safeguarded in a manner consistent with this order; and

(3) limits the access granted to former Presidential appointees or designees and Vice Presidential appointees or designees to items that the person originated, reviewed, signed, or received while serving as a Presidential or Vice Presidential appointee or designee.

PART 5 -- IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW

Sec. 5.1. Program Direction. (a) The Director of the Information Security Oversight Office, under the direction of the Archivist and in consultation with the National Security Advisor, shall issue such directives as are necessary to implement this order. These directives shall be binding on the agencies. Directives issued by the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office shall establish standards for:

(1) classification, declassification, and marking principles;

(2) safeguarding classified information, which shall pertain to the handling, storage, distribution, transmittal, and destruction of and accounting for classified information;

(3) agency security education and training programs;

(4) agency self-inspection programs; and

(5) classification and declassification guides.

(b) The Archivist shall delegate the implementation and monitoring functions of this program to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office.

(c) The Director of National Intelligence, after consultation with the heads of affected agencies and the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office, may issue directives to implement this order with respect to the protection of intelligence sources, methods, and activities. Such directives shall be consistent with this order and directives issued under paragraph (a) of this section.

Sec. 5.2. Information Security Oversight Office. (a) There is established within the National Archives an Information Security Oversight Office. The Archivist shall appoint the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office, subject to the approval of the President.

(b) Under the direction of the Archivist, acting in consultation with the National Security Advisor, the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office shall:

(1) develop directives for the implementation of this order;

(2) oversee agency actions to ensure compliance with this order and its implementing directives;

(3) review and approve agency implementing regulations prior to their issuance to ensure their consistency with this order and directives issued under section 5.1(a) of this order;

(4) have the authority to conduct on-site reviews of each agency's program established under this order, and to require of each agency those reports and information and other cooperation that may be necessary to fulfill its responsibilities. If granting access to specific categories of classified information would pose an exceptional national security risk, the affected agency head or the senior agency official shall submit a written justification recommending the denial of access to the President through the National Security Advisor within 60 days of the request for access. Access shall be denied pending the response;

(5) review requests for original classification authority from agencies or officials not granted original classification authority and, if deemed appropriate, recommend Presidential approval through the National Security Advisor;

(6) consider and take action on complaints and suggestions from persons within or outside the Government with respect to the administration of the program established under this order;

(7) have the authority to prescribe, after consultation with affected agencies, standardization of forms or procedures that will promote the implementation of the program established under this order;

(8) report at least annually to the President on the implementation of this order; and

(9) convene and chair interagency meetings to discuss matters pertaining to the program established by this order.

Sec. 5.3. Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel.

(a) Establishment and administration.

(1) There is established an Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel. The Departments of State, Defense, and Justice, the National Archives, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the National Security Advisor shall each be represented by a senior-level representative who is a full-time or permanent part-time Federal officer or employee designated to serve as a member of the Panel by the respective agency head. The President shall designate a Chair from among the members of the Panel.

(2) Additionally, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency may appoint a temporary representative who meets the criteria in paragraph (a)(1) of this section to participate as a voting member in all Panel deliberations and associated support activities concerning classified information originated by the Central Intelligence Agency.

(3) A vacancy on the Panel shall be filled as quickly as possible as provided in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

(4) The Director of the Information Security Oversight Office shall serve as the Executive Secretary of the Panel. The staff of the Information Security Oversight Office shall provide program and administrative support for the Panel.

(5) The members and staff of the Panel shall be required to meet eligibility for access standards in order to fulfill the Panel's functions.

(6) The Panel shall meet at the call of the Chair. The Chair shall schedule meetings as may be necessary for the Panel to fulfill its functions in a timely manner.

(7) The Information Security Oversight Office shall include in its reports to the President a summary of the Panel's activities.

(b) Functions. The Panel shall:

(1) decide on appeals by persons who have filed classification challenges under section 1.8 of this order;

(2) approve, deny, or amend agency exemptions from automatic declassification as provided in section 3.3 of this order;

(3) decide on appeals by persons or entities who have filed requests for mandatory declassification review under section 3.5 of this order; and

(4) appropriately inform senior agency officials and the public of final Panel decisions on appeals under sections 1.8 and 3.5 of this order.

(c) Rules and procedures. The Panel shall issue bylaws, which shall be published in the Federal Register. The bylaws shall establish the rules and procedures that the Panel will follow in accepting, considering, and issuing decisions on appeals. The rules and procedures of the Panel shall provide that the Panel will consider appeals only on actions in which:

(1) the appellant has exhausted his or her administrative remedies within the responsible agency;

(2) there is no current action pending on the issue within the Federal courts; and

(3) the information has not been the subject of review by the Federal courts or the Panel within the past 2 years.

(d) Agency heads shall cooperate fully with the Panel so that it can fulfill its functions in a timely and fully informed manner. The Panel shall report to the President through the National Security Advisor any instance in which it believes that an agency head is not cooperating fully with the Panel.

(e) The Panel is established for the sole purpose of advising and assisting the President in the discharge of his constitutional and discretionary authority to protect the national security of the United States. Panel decisions are committed to the discretion of the Panel, unless changed by the President.

(f) An agency head may appeal a decision of the Panel to the President through the National Security Advisor. The information shall remain classified pending a decision on the appeal.

Sec. 5.4. General Responsibilities. Heads of agencies that originate or handle classified information shall:

(a) demonstrate personal commitment and commit senior management to the successful implementation of the program established under this order;

(b) commit necessary resources to the effective implementation of the program established under this order;

(c) ensure that agency records systems are designed and maintained to optimize the appropriate sharing and safeguarding of classified information, and to facilitate its declassification under the terms of this order when it no longer meets the standards for continued classification; and

(d) designate a senior agency official to direct and administer the program, whose responsibilities shall include:

(1) overseeing the agency's program established under this order, provided an agency head may designate a separate official to oversee special access programs authorized under this order. This official shall provide a full accounting of the agency's special access programs at least annually;

(2) promulgating implementing regulations, which shall be published in the Federal Register to the extent that they affect members of the public;

(3) establishing and maintaining security education and training programs;

(4) establishing and maintaining an ongoing self inspection program, which shall include the regular reviews of representative samples of the agency's original and derivative classification actions, and shall authorize appropriate agency officials to correct misclassification actions not covered by sections 1.7(c) and 1.7(d) of this order; and reporting annually to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office on the agency's self-inspection program;

(5) establishing procedures consistent with directives issued pursuant to this order to prevent unnecessary access to classified information, including procedures that:

(A) require that a need for access to classified information be established before initiating administrative clearance procedures; and

(B) ensure that the number of persons granted access to classified information meets the mission needs of the agency while also satisfying operational and security requirements and needs;

(6) developing special contingency plans for the safeguarding of classified information used in or near hostile or potentially hostile areas;

(7) ensuring that the performance contract or other system used to rate civilian or military personnel performance includes the designation and management of classified information as a critical element or item to be evaluated in the rating of:

(A) original classification authorities;

(B) security managers or security specialists; and

(C) all other personnel whose duties significantly involve the creation or handling of classified information, including personnel who regularly apply derivative classification markings;

(8) accounting for the costs associated with the implementation of this order, which shall be reported to the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office for publication;

(9) assigning in a prompt manner agency personnel to respond to any request, appeal, challenge, complaint, or suggestion arising out of this order that pertains to classified information that originated in a component of the agency that no longer exists and for which there is no clear successor in function; and

(10) establishing a secure capability to receive information, allegations, or complaints regarding over-classification or incorrect classification within the agency and to provide guidance to personnel on proper classification as needed.

Sec. 5.5. Sanctions. (a) If the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office finds that a violation of this order or its implementing directives has occurred, the Director shall make a report to the head of the agency or to the senior agency official so that corrective steps, if appropriate, may be taken.

(b) Officers and employees of the United States Government, and its contractors, licensees, certificate holders, and grantees shall be subject to appropriate sanctions if they knowingly, willfully, or negligently:

(1) disclose to unauthorized persons information properly classified under this order or predecessor orders;

(2) classify or continue the classification of information in violation of this order or any implementing directive;

(3) create or continue a special access program contrary to the requirements of this order; or

(4) contravene any other provision of this order or its implementing directives.

(c) Sanctions may include reprimand, suspension without pay, removal, termination of classification authority, loss or denial of access to classified information, or other sanctions in accordance with applicable law and agency regulation.

(d) The agency head, senior agency official, or other supervisory official shall, at a minimum, promptly remove the classification authority of any individual who demonstrates reckless disregard or a pattern of error in applying the classification standards of this order.

(e) The agency head or senior agency official shall:

(1) take appropriate and prompt corrective action when a violation or infraction under paragraph (b) of this section occurs; and

(2) notify the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office when a violation under paragraph (b)(1), (2), or (3) of this section occurs.

PART 6 -- GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 6.1. Definitions. For purposes of this order:

(a) "Access" means the ability or opportunity to gain knowledge of classified information.

(b) "Agency" means any "Executive agency," as defined in 5 U.S.C. 105; any "Military department" as defined in 5 U.S.C. 102; and any other entity within the executive branch that comes into the possession of classified information.

(c) "Authorized holder" of classified information means anyone who satisfies the conditions for access stated in section 4.1(a) of this order.

(d) "Automated information system" means an assembly of computer hardware, software, or firmware configured to collect, create, communicate, compute, disseminate, process, store, or control data or information.

(e) "Automatic declassification" means the declassification of information based solely upon:

(1) the occurrence of a specific date or event as determined by the original classification authority; or

(2) the expiration of a maximum time frame for duration of classification established under this order.

(f) "Classification" means the act or process by which information is determined to be classified information.

(g) "Classification guidance" means any instruction or source that prescribes the classification of specific information.

(h) "Classification guide" means a documentary form of classification guidance issued by an original classification authority that identifies the elements of information regarding a specific subject that must be classified and establishes the level and duration of classification for each such element.

(i) "Classified national security information" or "classified information" means information that has been determined pursuant to this order or any predecessor order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure and is marked to indicate its classified status when in documentary form.

(j) "Compilation" means an aggregation of preexisting unclassified items of information.

(k) "Confidential source" means any individual or organization that has provided, or that may reasonably be expected to provide, information to the United States on matters pertaining to the national security with the expectation that the information or relationship, or both, are to be held in confidence.

(l) "Damage to the national security" means harm to the national defense or foreign relations of the United States from the unauthorized disclosure of information, taking into consideration such aspects of the information as the sensitivity, value, utility, and provenance of that information.

(m) "Declassification" means the authorized change in the status of information from classified information to unclassified information.

(n) "Declassification guide" means written instructions issued by a declassification authority that describes the elements of information regarding a specific subject that may be declassified and the elements that must remain classified.

(o) "Derivative classification" means the incorporating, paraphrasing, restating, or generating in new form information that is already classified, and marking the newly developed material consistent with the classification markings that apply to the source information. Derivative classification includes the classification of information based on classification guidance. The duplication or reproduction of existing classified information is not derivative classification.

(p) "Document" means any recorded information, regardless of the nature of the medium or the method or circumstances of recording.

(q) "Downgrading" means a determination by a declassification authority that information classified and safeguarded at a specified level shall be classified and safeguarded at a lower level.

(r) "File series" means file units or documents arranged according to a filing system or kept together because they relate to a particular subject or function, result from the same activity, document a specific kind of transaction, take a particular physical form, or have some other relationship arising out of their creation, receipt, or use, such as restrictions on access or use.

(s) "Foreign government information" means:
(1) information provided to the United States Government by a foreign government or governments,
an international organization of governments, or any element thereof, with the expectation that the information, the source of the information, or both, are to be held in confidence;

(2) information produced by the United States Government pursuant to or as a result of a joint arrangement with a foreign government or governments, or an international organization of governments, or any element thereof, requiring that the information, the arrangement, or both, are to be held in confidence; or

(3) information received and treated as "foreign government information" under the terms of a predecessor order.

(t) "Information" means any knowledge that can be communicated or documentary material, regardless of its physical form or characteristics, that is owned by, is produced by or for, or is under the control of the United States Government.

(u) "Infraction" means any knowing, willful, or negligent action contrary to the requirements of this order or its implementing directives that does not constitute a "violation," as defined below.

(v) "Integral file block" means a distinct component of a file series, as defined in this section, that should be maintained as a separate unit in order to ensure the integrity of the records. An integral file block may consist of a set of records covering either a specific topic or a range of time, such as a Presidential administration or a 5-year retirement schedule within a specific file series that is retired from active use as a group. For purposes of automatic
declassification, integral file blocks shall contain only records dated within 10 years of the oldest record in the file block.

(w) "Integrity" means the state that exists when information is unchanged from its source and has not been accidentally or intentionally modified, altered, or destroyed.

(x) "Intelligence" includes foreign intelligence and counterintelligence as defined by Executive Order 12333 of December 4, 1981, as amended, or by a successor order.

(y) "Intelligence activities" means all activities that elements of the Intelligence Community are authorized to conduct pursuant to law or Executive Order 12333, as amended, or a successor order.

(z) "Intelligence Community" means an element or agency of the U.S. Government identified in or designated pursuant to section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, or section 3.5(h) of Executive Order 12333, as amended.

(aa) "Mandatory declassification review" means the review for declassification of classified information in response to a request for declassification that meets the requirements under section 3.5 of this order.

(bb) "Multiple sources" means two or more source documents, classification guides, or a combination of both.

(cc) "National security" means the national defense or foreign relations of the United States.

(dd) "Need-to-know" means a determination within the executive branch in accordance with directives issued pursuant to this order that a prospective recipient requires access to specific classified information in order to perform or assist in a lawful and authorized governmental function.

(ee) "Network" means a system of two or more computers that can exchange data or information.

(ff) "Original classification" means an initial determination that information requires, in the interest of the national security, protection against unauthorized disclosure.

(gg) "Original classification authority" means an individual authorized in writing, either by the President, the Vice President, or by agency heads or other officials designated by the President, to classify information in the first instance.

(hh) "Records" means the records of an agency and Presidential papers or Presidential records, as those terms are defined in title 44, United States Code, including those created or maintained by a government contractor, licensee, certificate holder, or grantee that are subject to the sponsoring agency's control under the terms of the contract, license, certificate, or grant.

(ii) "Records having permanent historical value" means Presidential papers or Presidential records and the records of an agency that the Archivist has determined should be maintained permanently in accordance with title 44, United States Code.

(jj) "Records management" means the planning, controlling, directing, organizing, training, promoting, and other managerial activities involved with respect to records creation, records maintenance and use, and records disposition in order to achieve adequate and proper documentation of the policies and transactions of the Federal Government and effective and economical management of agency operations.

(kk) "Safeguarding" means measures and controls that are prescribed to protect classified information.

(ll) "Self-inspection" means the internal review and evaluation of individual agency activities and the agency as a whole with respect to the implementation of the program established under this order and its implementing directives.

(mm) "Senior agency official" means the official designated by the agency head under section 5.4(d) of this order to direct and administer the agency's program under which information is classified, safeguarded, and declassified.

(nn) "Source document" means an existing document that contains classified information that is incorporated, paraphrased, restated, or generated in new form into a new document.

(oo) "Special access program" means a program established for a specific class of classified information that imposes safeguarding and access requirements that exceed those normally required for information at the same classification level.

(pp) "Systematic declassification review" means the review for declassification of classified information contained in records that have been determined by the Archivist to have permanent historical value in accordance with title 44, United States Code.

(qq) "Telecommunications" means the preparation, transmission, or communication of information by electronic means.

(rr) "Unauthorized disclosure" means a communication or physical transfer of classified information to an unauthorized recipient.

(ss) "U.S. entity" includes:

(1) State, local, or tribal governments;

(2) State, local, and tribal law enforcement and firefighting entities;

(3) public health and medical entities;

(4) regional, state, local, and tribal emergency management entities, including State Adjutants General and other appropriate public safety entities; or

(5) private sector entities serving as part of the nation's Critical Infrastructure/Key Resources.

(tt) "Violation" means:

(1) any knowing, willful, or negligent action that could reasonably be expected to result in an unauthorized disclosure of classified information;

(2) any knowing, willful, or negligent action to classify or continue the classification of information contrary to the requirements of this order or its implementing directives; or

(3) any knowing, willful, or negligent action to create or continue a special access program contrary to the requirements of this order.

(uu) "Weapons of mass destruction" means any weapon of mass destruction as defined in 50 U.S.C. 1801(p).

Sec. 6.2. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall supersede any requirement made by or under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or the National Security Act of 1947, as amended. "Restricted Data" and "Formerly Restricted Data" shall be handled, protected, classified, downgraded, and declassified in conformity with the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and regulations issued under that Act.

(b) The Director of National Intelligence may, with respect to the Intelligence Community and after consultation with the heads of affected departments and agencies, issue such policy directives and guidelines as the Director of National Intelligence deems necessary to implement this order with respect to the classification and declassification of all intelligence and intelligence-related information, and for access to and dissemination of all intelligence and intelligence-related information, both in its final form and in the form when initially gathered. Procedures or other guidance issued by Intelligence Community element heads shall be in accordance with such policy directives or guidelines issued by the Director of National Intelligence. Any such policy directives or guidelines issued by the Director of National Intelligence shall be in accordance with directives issued by the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office under section 5.1(a) of this order.

(c) The Attorney General, upon request by the head of an agency or the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office, shall render an interpretation of this order with respect to any question arising in the course of its administration.

(d) Nothing in this order limits the protection afforded any information by other provisions of law, including the Constitution, Freedom of Information Act exemptions, the Privacy Act of 1974, and the National Security Act of 1947, as amended. This order is not intended to and does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. The foregoing is in addition to the specific provisos set forth in sections 1.1(b), 3.1(c) and 5.3(e) of this order.

(e) Nothing in this order shall be construed to obligate action or otherwise affect functions by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(f) This order shall be implemented subject to the availability of appropriations.

(g) Executive Order 12958 of April 17, 1995, and amendments thereto, including Executive Order 13292 of March 25, 2003, are hereby revoked as of the effective date of this order.

Sec. 6.3. Effective Date. This order is effective 180 days from the date of this order, except for sections 1.7, 3.3, and 3.7, which are effective immediately.

Sec. 6.4. Publication. The Archivist of the United States shall publish this Executive Order in the Federal Register.

BARACK OBAMA

THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 29, 2009.


# # #



Twitter Instagram Facebook Google+ Youtube More ways to engage Contact Us Email

[HB Vic]

Hey 2MM can you boil this down to something I can digest over a beer?? lol

[cdnoutlaw]

Hey 2MM can you boil this down to something I can digest over a beer?? lol

Ya! TMI
To much info


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[2manymustangs]

Hey 2MM can you boil this down to something I can digest over a beer?? lol

Ya, either BOBO totally screwed the pooch regarding the classification process OR Hillary is guilty of treason (exchanging/compromising MUCHO foreign government info) or both... I vote for both... :D

There is explicit criteria for what constitutes CLASSIFIED info, the little C or a big C or CLASSIFIED headers don't mean squat... HITLERY being former first lady, senator and sitting on the senate foreign arms committee and also being SOS, she knows the classified info game... She committed treason and should be wearing a orange jump suit, along with her co-conspirators...

[2manymustangs]

Scan / scroll it now for my highlights... :) I have read it about 5x today...


https://www.c-span.org/video/?415070-1/federal-officials-testify-fbis-investigation-hillary-clinton&live (https://www.c-span.org/video/?415070-1/federal-officials-testify-fbis-investigation-hillary-clinton&live)

[spike morelli]

Did anyone catch the Congressional hearing where the FBI was asked if they would turn over to Congress the complete findings on Clintons E-Mails and Depositions, and the FBI guy said he could not and would not with out a Congressional Subpoena. BOOM! The Speaker handed him an already signed Congressional Subpoena and said "Sir, you have been served ". This was on National TV. It's kinda like having your pants pulled down in front of the entire school! The FBI only has ONE person higher than them....Obama. I wouldn't be surprised if both the Clintons and Barack Obama are implicated in criminal goings on.

[CarolynandBob]

"Supposedly" diagnosed with Pneumonia on Friday. On Friday she appeared ok at all appearances. So, there goes your BS story.

If you look at the behavior of the Secret Service and other staff, they do not look that concerned. Their behavior made it look like "no big deal" we have seen this before.

Why go to Chelsea's? Why not a doctor?

One radio host in San Diego who says he has a source that said it is Parkinson's and epilepsy. Don't know.

Rush was funny yesterday when he said woman all over the USA want to know what they gave her at Chelsea's. She looked like death and the an hour and a half later, she looked 100% better. LOL

[314joey]

Hillary and Billy having "fun" at Halloween.

[2manymustangs]

"Supposedly" diagnosed with Pneumonia on Friday. On Friday she appeared ok at all appearances. So, there goes your BS story.

If you look at the behavior of the Secret Service and other staff, they do not look that concerned. Their behavior made it look like "no big deal" we have seen this before.

Why go to Chelsea's? Why not a doctor?

One radio host in San Diego who says he has a source that said it is Parkinson's and epilepsy. Don't know.

Rush was funny yesterday when he said woman all over the USA want to know what they gave her at Chelsea's. She looked like death and the an hour and a half later, she looked 100% better. LOL

I read yesterday that she was diagnosed with a thrombosis in her nasal area that causes pressure on her brain with effects much like a stroke or something of that effect. That could have fatal results, it was revealed in a email that Huma Abbbajeeen sent which was recovered by Julian A....

[2manymustangs]

Hillary and Billy having "fun" at Halloween.

Woah mama.... THAT is gonna leave a mark!!!! I can't wait to see The Donald and "The Media" to handle this one....

[2manymustangs]

Did anyone catch the Congressional hearing where the FBI was asked if they would turn over to Congress the complete findings on Clintons E-Mails and Depositions, and the FBI guy said he could not and would not with out a Congressional Subpoena. BOOM! The Speaker handed him an already signed Congressional Subpoena and said "Sir, you have been served ". This was on National TV. It's kinda like having your pants pulled down in front of the entire school! The FBI only has ONE person higher than them....Obama. I wouldn't be surprised if both the Clintons and Barack Obama are implicated in criminal goings on.

You will like the exchange that started at 30 minutes in the video link above ^^^ :) The opening statements from the Chairman is pretty strong also... at 98 minutes from Mr Jordan of Ohio has some interesting words for special agent Herring